@marke Answer: it would look like a world moving forward instead of stuck in time. What else in human civilization has stayed the same for more than a century?
@marke Irony. I wish there's enough time to teach you what it means. Would you like to consider the possibility of what the world might look like if we continue abusing fossil fuels? Or wait until we ran out, and then wait for people like you to take their heads out of asses, and say "hey, how did we get here, must be the LGBTQ Marxist, Islamist cabal, inflicted on us by Biden, 25 years ago".
@Northwest There is no reason for alarm about assumed global warming that may be a developing pattern of rising temperatures of about 1 degree in 100 years. If that trend is a danger then humans had better get used to it because humans cannot stop such weather changes. Attempting to reduce the level of atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide will prove futile and is not necessary at any rate because reducing CO2 would harm plant life on earth that depends on CO2.
There is no reason for alarm about assumed global warming that may be a developing pattern of rising temperatures of about 1 degree in 100 years. If that trend is a danger then humans had better get used to it because humans cannot stop such weather changes. Attempting to reduce the level of atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide will prove futile and is not necessary at any rate because reducing CO2 would harm plant life on earth that depends on CO2.
The scary thing, is that you seem to be convinced what you're saying is true. While some of what you say is true, it does NOT represent the full story.
An increase in CO2 level, corresponds to a similar rate increase in some above-ground plant life and about double that rate for underground plant life, as well as a reduction in water requirements But, that's only. part of the story, because the increase impacts nitrogen level, the most critical element to plants’ growth, as well as temperature and water. The end result of this system of dynamics, is LESS food, not more food.
I wish I had enough time to educate you on climate change, but judging from your CO2 claim, that's not going to fit your political agenda, and that's a problem, because you're resorting to politics, instead of science. But, you probably voted for Reagan, the guy who believed trees were bad for the environment, because they're toxic.
@Northwest You cannot change or control the weather. Just one volcano blows years of human efforts right out the window. Global warming alarmists have been duped into adopting assumptions, speculations, and postulations falsely labeled as science.
@Northwest there is nothing but politics for people like him. Everything has to be tied to politics. They can't wrap their head around any other concept.
@summersmiles and don’t seem to understand they’re making strawman arguments. Yes, a volcano will erupt, but that does not give a free hand to destroy.