Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

San Francisco OKs Surveillance Plan Allowing Police to Access Private Cameras in Real Time

San Francisco on Tuesday approved of a new security policy allowing police to access thousands of private cameras in a live feed without a search warrant.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors, the legislative body for the city, voted 7-4 to test Mayor London Breed’s surveillance camera proposal, which will take effect in 30 days and sunset in 15 months.

Under the policy, the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) can access cameras owned by city residents and businesses who give police the OK to monitor them, potentially opening up thousands of private surveillance cameras to officers.

The new policy raises fears of a potentially Orwellian surveillance state.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit organization that defends civil liberties in the digital space, called the new policy a “troubling ordinance” that could have a chilling effect on First Amendment and other rights.

“Make no mistake, misdemeanors like vandalism or jaywalking happen on nearly every street of San Francisco on any given day — meaning that this ordinance essentially gives the SFPD the ability to put the entire city under live surveillance indefinitely,” the organization wrote in a press release.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/3656738-san-francisco-oks-surveillance-plan-allowing-police-to-access-private-cameras-in-real-time/

🤬

Next will be a law REQUIRING citizens to provide access.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Graylight · 51-55, F
Under the policy, the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) can access cameras owned by city residents and businesses who give police the OK to monitor them, potentially opening up thousands of private surveillance cameras to officers.

The legislation suggests police can monitor the cameras in a live feed for any “significant events with public safety concerns” or in the course of a criminal investigation in which camera access is needed.

Previously, police had to request access to camera feeds based on specific incidents and time stamps after a crime occurs or for a related investigation, and could only access them in real time in the event of imminent danger.

A responsible user will use the cameras for their intended purpose and those cameras will be positioned so as not to compromise any property or people, as is law. We want to be secure, we want police to be the best they can be, we demand safety in our towns and then we panic about volunteering the same footage that could be found from a public camera if one were posted. Can't have it both ways.