Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do we need a Ministry for the Future?

No political body represents the interests of the unborn against the damage done in the here and now. What id there was? Ministry for the future is the name of the book I'm reading by KIm Stanly Robinson, set in a near future in which the climate crisis is taken seriously.

[b][i]It was getting hotter...[/i][/b]

The novel starts with a genocidal heatwave that kills tens of millions. This is scarily prescient given the flood crisis in neighbouring Pakistan. The reader doesn't just get statistics, but excruciating detail about burning skin and bodies floating in lakes. After this event, the world leaders are morally forced to form the Ministry to tackle climate change, funding it lavishly (though never lavishly enough because the resources lost by the climate crisis dwarf anything else)

The book goes heavily into the science of climate change and also solutions, such as crazy plans to thicken the polar ice caps, putting sulphur in the sky to temporarily cool the planet etc. At least a third of the book is non-fiction but this is necessary. It also deals with politics, in that having our economies based on permanent growth in a world with finite resources is self-destructive. Those on the side of the climate have to fight against corporate sabotage. Eco-terrorism is rife, with CEOs of energy companies on the hit list.

I won't spoil it but my favourite scene so far features a fractious debate between a terrorist and a well-meaning politician. When the crazed terrorist claims that working within the law will lead to species destruction, the minister cannot come up with a convincing answer to refute him.

I'm still reading it but it's highly recommended.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
spjennifer · 56-60, T
I think our biggest problem is caused by overpopulation, the more babies are born, the more they consume, food, water, natural resources, land, and the more we produce, waste, CO2, pollution etc. We need to start reducing population increase as this will help in all aspects of climate change. A "Ministry of the Future" would accomplish little if there is no future to guard. It took since the beginning of time till 1804 for our population to grow to 1 Billion and only about 200 years more for it to grow to the 7+ Billion we are now and expected to reach 8 Billion before this year ends and 10 Billion by 2050 is expected.
Philth · 46-50, M
@spjennifer definitely. An infinitely growing population on a planet of finite resources is, quite obviously, unsustainable, but unfortunately no democratically elected organisation will survive saying that. Thus, we seal our own fate.
spjennifer · 56-60, T
@Philth Agreed, China did this decades ago, albeit for different reasons but they are still criticized for it even today. I believe that at some point nature will right itself and there will be a mass extinction event, as you state the current situation is unsustainable...
Ballou · 56-60, F
@Philth sad but very true.