Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do we need a Ministry for the Future?

No political body represents the interests of the unborn against the damage done in the here and now. What id there was? Ministry for the future is the name of the book I'm reading by KIm Stanly Robinson, set in a near future in which the climate crisis is taken seriously.

[b][i]It was getting hotter...[/i][/b]

The novel starts with a genocidal heatwave that kills tens of millions. This is scarily prescient given the flood crisis in neighbouring Pakistan. The reader doesn't just get statistics, but excruciating detail about burning skin and bodies floating in lakes. After this event, the world leaders are morally forced to form the Ministry to tackle climate change, funding it lavishly (though never lavishly enough because the resources lost by the climate crisis dwarf anything else)

The book goes heavily into the science of climate change and also solutions, such as crazy plans to thicken the polar ice caps, putting sulphur in the sky to temporarily cool the planet etc. At least a third of the book is non-fiction but this is necessary. It also deals with politics, in that having our economies based on permanent growth in a world with finite resources is self-destructive. Those on the side of the climate have to fight against corporate sabotage. Eco-terrorism is rife, with CEOs of energy companies on the hit list.

I won't spoil it but my favourite scene so far features a fractious debate between a terrorist and a well-meaning politician. When the crazed terrorist claims that working within the law will lead to species destruction, the minister cannot come up with a convincing answer to refute him.

I'm still reading it but it's highly recommended.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Yulianna · 22-25, F
sounds interesting... but i think it would be more effective, in real world, for every government department to have a junior minister responsible for future, and a grand committee of all these ministers to monitor cross departmental activities. as they progressed in their careers, you would eventually have a whole series of senior ministers with experience of future watching, running the major departments. it could change the whole thinking of how to govern.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Yulianna The British one would be run by Jacob Reece-Mogg. Other than that, its a reasonable point.
Yulianna · 22-25, F
@Burnley123 only if you wanted your ministry for the future to be looking backwards all the time...
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Yulianna Yeah to the 17th century.
@Yulianna Interesting idea and a good way to train.
But our needs are urgent and critical.
We can't afford to wait 40 years for action on climate change; if we did most species would be extinct and many millions of people will have starved, drowned or died in their attempts to migrate.
Yulianna · 22-25, F
@hartfire and you are proposing to leave the people who got us into this state in charge?