Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Capitalism and Human Nature

Conservatives and Liberals tend to defend capitalism by asserting that it is natural if not a reflection of human nature.
However when it is placed under any degree of scrutiny, this assertion reveals itself to be completly false!
Capitalism is a fairly recent phenomenon. Centuries before the Industrial Revolution precolonial and indigenious populations followed socialist and anarchist principles.
Even putting that aside human behaviour is diverse and has varied so much over the course of our history that the concept of calling any set of characteristics "Human Nature" is absurd.
The only consistent characteristic has been the abillity to adapt to our circumstances.
Therefore if the current system incentivizes greed people are logically going to be more greedy.
It stands to reason, then, that if humanity will adapt to the circumstances it is put under, we should adopt a system that would provide the most good to the most people.
As we have seen throughout it's existance Capitalism is not that system!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Northwest · M
I realize you're trying to make point, but the point needs to be historically accurate.

Objectively speaking, socialism, as it applies to entire societies, not capitalism, is a fairly recent phenomenon. Humanity developed as a progressively larger set of tribes, where "chiefs" got to keep most of the wealth, followed by their Lieutenants, and the little people lived off their table scraps. There was camaraderie among the among people, out of necessity, and that went away when they went up the social ladder.
SW-User
@Northwest You are refering to stratified tribal societies that existed in India and China who yes indeed had early class building.
Northwest · M
@SW-User
You are refering to stratified tribal societies that existed in India and China who yes indeed had early class building.

No, I am referring to humans, period, going all the way back to the dawn of humanity.
SW-User
@Northwest Hunter gatherer societies were egalitarian and tribal societies had limited instances of social rank and prestige
Northwest · M
@SW-User https://aeon.co/essays/not-all-early-human-societies-were-small-scale-egalitarian-bands