I'll try again. Give me an example of a racist fire science question.

I realize that libs are a bit slow, so I boiled it down, and left out the fire department part.

WHAT PART OF PUTTING OUT A FIRE, IS RACIST?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ItsSteve · 46-50, M

Ok, to make it clear, there's nothing racist about putting out a fire.

JimBeam · M

@ItsSteve

You should read my first post. lol It was nothing but reeee-tards.

ItsSteve · 46-50, M

@JimBeam I read your first post. I responded to your first post explaining the particulars of the case and what you misunderstood about it. You deleted my response in order to support the strawman you set up.

JimBeam · M

@ItsSteve

Are you capable of answering the question ?

ItsSteve · 46-50, M

@JimBeam I think i did already. There's nothing racist about knowing fire extinguishing skills, and while its possible to come up with explicitly racist test questions, I don't think anything about the questions were racist.

JimBeam · M

@ItsSteve

Thank you. The judge agrees with you. It was thrown out of court.

ItsSteve · 46-50, M

@JimBeam If you're talking about US and Vulcan Society v NYC, which it sounds like you're talking about, it wasn't. The court found it discriminatory and ordered injunctive relief. Here's a timeline of the case from the Center for Constitutional Rights

https://ccrjustice.org/home/what-we-do/our-cases/united-states-america-and-vulcan-society-inc-v-city-new-york

JimBeam · M

@ItsSteve

I'm talking about Vermont.

ItsSteve · 46-50, M

@JimBeam i thoufhr .you. were talking about NYC, which went the other way Whats the case?