FBI Now Going After Pennsylvania’s 2020 Alternate Electors Who Were Selected in Response to Stolen 2020 Election

The 2020 Election was stolen from the American people and President Trump. The FBI and DOJ were complicit when they turned the other way in states like Pennsylvania when crimes were committed.

In 2020 in Pennsylvania the FBI looked the other way when crimes were committed in Philadelphia as ballots were manufactured to make up for Joe Biden’s 700,000 ballot deficit to President Trump in the state.

In Philadelphia, Americans were physically and forcefully prevented from observing the election process and the FBI looked the other way.

A truck driver reported that he drove a truckload of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania and it disappeared, and the FBI attacked the young whistleblower in response. Former AG Bill Barr wouldn’t protect the whistleblower as well.

[b]Now PennLive is reporting:[/b]

Federal investigators delivered subpoenas or paid visits to several House and Senate Republican offices in the Pennsylvania Capitol on Tuesday and Wednesday, according to multiple sources.

At least some of the individuals receiving subpoenas were told they were not targets of an investigation, according to at least six sources reached by PennLive, but that they may have information of interest to the FBI. All of the sources had been briefed on the investigative moves in some way, but demanded anonymity in order to discuss them.

The information being requested centered around U.S. Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., and the effort to seek alternate electors as part of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to remain in office after the 2020 election, several sources said.

President Trump was trying to overcome a stolen election for the American people. This is why he was trying to remain in office. Joe Biden created hundreds of thousands of ballots after the 2020 Election to steal Pennsylvania. This was needed to overcome President Trump’s massive win.

Now the FBI is after Americans who were trying to legally overcome the stolen 2020 Election. This is tyranny. The communist fascists are in charge.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Roadsterrider · 56-60, M

I believe the election was stolen in PA, and I know people in AZ and GA and they feel the same way. But, the only way any of this is going to come into the light of day and be proven either way is if conservatives with the house and senate and the White House. No matter how it shakes out, I don't think anyone will ever be prosecuted for it and no matter what the outcome, it will take decades to repair the damage that Biden has done.

melbeacher · 56-60, M

@Roadsterrider Show me some evidence dude ! Otherwise you are making it up !

Budwick · 70-79, M

@melbeacher Look at it if you're genuine. Otherwise you're just another whiny dem.

[media=https://youtu.be/vQG12dPsGNQ]

melbeacher · 56-60, M

@Budwick Willian Barr watched it and said it was bullshit. And get it straight, I am an INDEPENDANT. And I a patiot and I love my country. Trump is the biggest enemy to the republic and democracy we have !

Budwick · 70-79, M

@melbeacher So, you take your thoughts from Bill Barr?

What does he think of the John Wick series?

Roadsterrider · 56-60, M

@melbeacher Absolutely, my opinion is "made up" by me, based on what I observed. The PA governor and legislature allowed changes in election law to count votes after poll closing, Trump was ahead when polls closed, clearly ahead. Then the local news stations were running video of people carrying garbage bags full of "mail in ballots" to stuff the ballot box. In PA, those votes counted after poll closing were enough to put Biden ahead comfortably winning PA. Harvested votes, outside the normal chain, absolutely not through the postal service. This is my opinion, I am not trying to change anyone else's mind, demanding proof when you offer none seems kind of ridiculous to me. The movie 2000 mules is referenced above, there seems to be a lot of evidence that the election was handled inappropriately, that should be enough to question the process even if the results of the election aren't.

Nobody had a problem with Al Gore contesting the results of the Florida election years ago, likewise, Hillary Clinton was encouraged to contest the results of her failed run.

If there are three elections in the last 20 years have been shady enough to justify challenging the results, for me, it is becoming difficult to believe the process is secure. 3 out of the last 5 elections have been suspicious. That is a 60% failure. Maybe you can prove the elections are above board. Maybe not.