I'm declaring a point. I truly believe that the cake is baked. Hereby even. Meaning, cons are just wallowing in conspiracy, that never ever comes to fruition,
@redredred I don't know if these were actual claims made by anyone, but let's say they are. Those aren't conspiracy theories. A claim that turns out to be wrong is not the same as a theory involving secret shadowy figures engaged in a spooky plot.
@BohemianBabe Right. In fact, many conspiracy theories take the form of "a conspiracy is why X didn't happen;" for example, asserting that Hillary and Obama committed treason, but "deep state" prevented the Trump DoJ from prosecuting.
Although there are plenty of the other kind of conspiracy theory too. Examples I've seen here on S/W: "A conspiracy of scientists is fudging all the global climate data." "A conspiracy of doctors is spreading false COVID concerns." "A conspiracy at CDC is vastly inflating death counts." "A conspiracy is allowing Bill Gates to chip everyone with vaccines." etc, etc, etc. And of course there are all the election related conspiracies; here's just two:
No, investigators have not turned up a SINGLE ONE of the alleged ballots allegedly printed by foreign countries.
If the machines were altering the count like Trump claimed, how come the hand count matched the machine count so closely???
In all, there were 126 counties within 10 votes of their original vote tally, according to the audit data. Of those counties, 54 counties matched their initial results exactly. No county had an error rate higher than 0.73% compared to their original results.
No, investigators have not turned up a SINGLE ONE of the alleged ballots allegedly printed by foreign countries.
