How can American supreme Court put importance over unborn fetus over grown kids in schools who have to go through school shootings?

@BizSuitStacy so that makes taking away a woman's tights to have choice over her body OK? Well as long as your gun rights aren't taken away then who cares

@Loopysoutherner but nobody's abortions are being taken away. Says so right at the beginning.

@BizSuitStacy putting the decision in the hands of the state is taking away a womans rights

@Loopysoutherner no it isn't. A woman can still get an abortion.

@BizSuitStacy yet the supreme Court has overturned roe v wade which had granted women's freedom to an abortion in the early stages without any outside influence

@Loopysoutherner and a woman can still get an abortion in the early stages.

I've read the comments. It's hilarious how badly your getting schooled. I'm not an attorney, but I know some of the people you're arguing with on this thread are, and with real backgrounds in Constitutional law. They are dicing you up like a chef preparing to sautee vegetables.

@BizSuitStacy ye sure they are hun.

@BizSuitStacy letting a state decide on wether to make abortions legal or illegal is disgusting and wrong

@Loopysoutherner Indeed you are being dismantled on here by others who actually understand law and the Constitution...not that you are smart enough to recognize it.

Was abortion ever codified as a right? LOL. No. As Alito stated, R v W was on a collision course with the Constitution. That's why SCOTUS pushed the decision on the laws back to the states.

"Roe found that the Constitution implicitly conferred a right to obtain an abortion, but it failed to ground its decision in text, history, or precedent. It relied on an erroneous historical narrative; it devoted great attention to and presumably relied on matters that have no bearing on the meaning of the Constitution; it disregarded the fundamental difference between the precedents on which it relied and the question before the Court; it concocted an elaborate set of rules, with different restrictions for each trimester of pregnancy, but it did not explain how this veritable code could be teased out of anything in the Constitution, the history of abortion laws, prior precedent, or any other cited source; and its most important rule (that States cannot protect fetal life prior to ‘viability’) was never raised by any Opinion of the Court party and has never been plausibly explained."

Besides being a giant Karen about the issue, your moral position on abortion is reprehensible.

@BizSuitStacy how's wanting women to have complete say on how they control their bodies being a Karen? It's a massive potential of violations of their personal liberty

@Loopysoutherner how is it a "massive potential of violations of their personal liberty" when you can still get an abortion? And what about the liberty of the innocent life that gets exterminated?

@BizSuitStacy you can't if your state makes it illegal which they now have the power to do

@Loopysoutherner which state did that?

@BizSuitStacy i said if it makes it illegal

@Loopysoutherner whaddaboutisms. No state is going to ban abortions entirely.

@BizSuitStacy i wouldn't be so sure. The people who are so called "pro life" are very loud.

@Loopysoutherner the pro death crowd is louder

@BizSuitStacy no such thing.