Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is the left still crying about Roe vs Wade ?

Or are they back to crying about Ukraine?

Never seen so many people get upset over not being able to kill babies
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MethDozer · M
Y'all say that until it comes down feeding, educating, clothing, and housing them. It's all "personal responsibility" once they are born.
SW-User
@MethDozer tell that to the hundreds of thousands of people putting up their hands to adopt but can't because the children have been killed

There is more support today than there ever has been in history for single mothers. It isn't about feeding, clothing, educating them

It is that they are inconvenient
MethDozer · M
@SW-User 2things
1) It isn't up to a woman to carry a baby in her body against her decided interest so someone who can't have one themeselves can adopt.

2) there's already more orphans than there are parents looking to adopt. Someone lookinf to adopt but hasn't either falls into cat. A) Deemed circumstances unfit fir adoption or B) is "shoppinf" fod a baby to adopt and can't find what they are lookinf for.


Your arguement falls flat.
SW-User
@MethDozer there are 26 couples for every baby or child available for adoption

The baby may be inconvenient but it didn't put itself there, the mother's choices did

Dismembering children because you like to do it bareback is about as lame as you can get
MethDozer · M
@SW-User Again it is not the reaponsibilty of one to breed for another to adopt. Also under your premise there should be zero orphans in existence. Which there are.

But adopters want the right race, right situation, right nationality, right age. It should be " you want to adopt? You get whatever number gets frawn for you."