Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Was the war in Afghanistan lost when it turned into a woke crusade?

How could the war in Afganistan have turned out better for America? The Taliban harbored terrorists who bombed a few of our most iconic buildings by exploiting serious security flaws in our airports. In a world of high technology and globalization, such orgaizations will always exist in the shadows somewhere. Did that justify our attempt to impose "Disney" style values on a backwards country trying to find its identity after centuries of opression?

Is it true that if the Afghan people really wanted to convert to western values, they would have? I suppose we wouldn't have had to fight them for 20 years to "save" them. Thoughts?

What should we do in the future in some similar situation? Thank you.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
I know what you're suggesting : that the secondary phase of the war , the strategy of nation building was doomed from the start. And I actually agree. But why on earth would you choose to characterise it as a 'woke crusade' ?
irishmolly72 · 56-60, F
@RodionRomanovitch Bush used the word "crusade". The west tried to impose woke values in a country not nearly agreeable to such things. Thus woke crusade.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@irishmolly72 It appears much of Afghanistan was ready to be "woke" -- or at least move forward -- but the extreme right used violence to take over. Happens a lot of places, it seems.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@irishmolly72 The west tried to impose democratic values. 'Woke' has nothing to do with this.
@irishmolly72 Anyone suggesting the Bush administration was "woke" in any capacity is just comical. Further proof to me that in the current GOP Ronald Reagan would be a commie pinko.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@ChipmunkErnie 'woke' has absolutely nothing to do with it. The way this word is being bandied about now strips it of any meaning.
@RodionRomanovitch At this point it is a meaningless word that just means whatever conservatives don't like at any given moment.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@RodionRomanovitch True re "woke". Re "imposing" democratic values, is it imposition if a large percentage of a population WANTS those values but can't fight their oppressors successfully.
irishmolly72 · 56-60, F
@ChipmunkErnie To have the temerity to make that claim is the essence of hegemon. America is a failure as a hegemon.
@irishmolly72 Empire is for fools.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@ChipmunkErnie It was the OP who said imposed , I was just swapping out woke for democratic.

You have to wonder , with hindsight , just how large a percentage of them did actually believe in the entire thing in the first place.