Pfizer Will Not Be Distributing Comirnaty

Normally I'd say this is unbelievable, until you consider the entities involved. The FDA approved version of the Pfizer covid vaccine, Comirnaty, is not going to be distributed to the public. The current Pfizer jab, manufactured by BioNTech under the BNT162b2 label is still under emergency use authorization, and the companies involved in its production and distribution are still protected under a liability shield.

https://lc.org/newsroom/details/061022-pfizers-fda-approved-covid-shot-will-never-be-available-1

If you recall last fall, U.S. Federal District Judge Allen Winsor, rejected the claim that BNT162b2 was interchangeable with Comirnaty. The FDA tried to claim they had the same formulation while admitting there were different ingredients and manufacturing processes. The case was to be revisted Sept. of 2022, but that may now be moot.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/judge-allen-winsor-pfizer-eua-comirnaty-vaccines-interchangeable/

So what really happened? A poker game where Pfizer bluffed, and now their bluff has been called. They had no real intention of distributing Comirnaty and exposing themselves to liability. And the recent release of the Pfizer/FDA documentation is likely why. Their hope was to bury the documentation for 75 years and to fool the public into believing they could be legally forced to receive an experimental vaccine.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

twiigss · M

So wait, I received a total of two shots. The paper I got at the doctors office says, "the shot you received today was Comirnaty"

You're saying that I didn't receive Comirnaty? Why would my doctors office lie to me about that? They seem pretty reputable.

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

@twiigss I think it proves that the original post and person posting here are both dishonest

BizSuitStacy · M

@twiigss read the articles.

twiigss · M

@BizSuitStacy But why would my doctors office lie to me about receiving Comirnaty, if I didn't receive it?

BizSuitStacy · M

@twiigss Did you read the articles? Honestly, doctors simply follow administrative guidelines from the hospital. The doctor himself or herself may not even realize the difference and thinks the products are interchangable.

The proof is in the pudding. An FDA approved product would no longer require the EUA. Why is it still in place?

twiigss · M

@BizSuitStacy No, I keep away from sensationalized articles. Just like, I don't watch any news on TV. Because 99% of it, is hyperbole, it's exaggeration, and it's not based on truth or fact. Some of it is true, and then that truth is spun with a few words to get people all worked up over nothing.

Sorry, but I can't keep putting energy into getting my hopes up for nothing. Just like the last year, year and a half, "OHHH so and so is gonna be prosecuted" or "Ohhh so and so is gonna be this or that" and what happened? Absolutely nothing. So forgive me if I can't get all worked up over it. I'm too old for it, and it physically wears me out.

There are waaayyyyy more important things in my life that I care about, than worrying over what some judge thinks.

BizSuitStacy · M

@twiigss So...you don't watch or read anything. So why bother asking the question if you don't care?

twiigss · M

@BizSuitStacy I'm just curious to know from you why my doctor would lie straight face to me. The paper said Comirnaty, you say I didn't receive Comirnaty. You've read the articles, so you should be able to answer that for me. Oh and you'll have to point out where I said I don't read anything. Good try.

If you can't answer or don't want to, then this conversation is done.