This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultAsking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Texas Shooting Another Reason to Repeal Section 230 of Title 47 of the U.S. Code.

Uvalde gunman threatened rapes and school shootings on social media app Yubo in weeks leading up to the massacre, users say.

Multiple users reported him to no effect.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/27/us/yubo-app-salvador-ramos-threats-invs/index.html

Perhaps such platforms should be required to have a link to a new federal law enforcement agency as a means of reporting such threats, since it's been made apparent over and over that internet platforms aren't capable of doing that.

I said a "new federal law enforcement agency" because otherwise... well, do you really think the Uvalde police department would have followed-up in a timely fashion. They couldn't even go after the gunman for an hour AFTER they arrived at the scene.

Or the FBI? Look how they bungled 9/11.

We need a new department under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice whose mandate is to immediately follow-up on such threats. Not gather information for prosecution in the event a crime is later committed but to act upon information so as to PREVENT a crime from being committed.

And the laws need to be changed so that MAKING such threats is a crime that WILL be punished.

If the Uvalde gunman was reported and ARRESTED for making the rape and murder threats, 19 children and their two teachers would be alive today.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
dakotaviper · 56-60, M
Well, that's what Red Flag Laws would accomplish. But they can be used for nefarious reasons. Because if I disagree with you or offend you in some way, I'd be in violation of a Red Flag Law and would have my Gun Ownership Rights taken away immediately. Would I ever get them back after I'm investigated? More than likely that would be a definite NO.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@dakotaviper Then when there is no complaint forthcoming but the government decides it wants to disarm you because you are of a certain political stripe how hard would it be to make up a false allegation? Look what Hillary/FBI did to Trump with her accusations about Russia.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@dakotaviper
But they can be used for nefarious reasons. Because if I disagree with you or offend you in some way, I'd be in violation of a Red Flag Law and would have my Gun Ownership Rights taken away immediately. Would I ever get them back after I'm investigated? More than likely that would be a definite NO.

That's what the Court system is for. To help decide who is telling the truth.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@hippyjoe1955

[media=https://youtu.be/iGyd5ZXCSS4]
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@beckyromero Because the court is so good at doing that..... Yeah best to leave it out completely.
dakotaviper · 56-60, M
@beckyromero Court system, you're joking aren't you. Or better than that, ask Kyle Rittenhouse if he has gotten his guns back. Because guess what, he hasn't.
I don't know why people can't see this. @hippyjoe1955