Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Pro-Choice Women Aren’t Rallying Around Dems’ Abortion Push.

Pro-Choice Women Aren’t Rallying Around Dems’ Abortion Push. Here’s Why.

Pro-choice suburban women are more concerned about the economy than threats to abortion access, according to several interviews conducted by Reuters.

Out of 16 pro-choice women of 21 total interviewed in Phoenix’s northern suburbs, only two said abortion was a priority for them heading into the midterms, Reuters reported. Instead, most were focused on the rising cost of inflation, which has skyrocketed.

Democrats are so out of touch with voting public.
Maybe cuz half of Biden voters were dead people.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
BabyLonia · F
So you are basing this on a sample size of 21?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@BabyLonia ...and from a minuscule geographic area, and no indication of selection methods, nor any indication of the phraseology used, nor any indication of margin of error (so huge as to be completely meaningless)... the list goes on and on.

It’s equivalent to asking the person who randomly sits next to you on the bus

Hilarious! 😂
BabyLonia · F
@newjaninev2 the survey that states 7% of Americans thinks chocolate milk comes from brown cows was taken from a bigger sample size 🤣🤣
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@newjaninev2 both the RNC and DNC take this poll very seriously .
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AthrillatheHunt 😂 😂 😂 😂
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@newjaninev2 they doooo. Lol
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@newjaninev2 that’s not what it is at all. Az is a highly contested swing state . This itty bitty little poll has huge implications. Both parties recognize this . You don’t have to even believe me . Lol
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AthrillatheHunt it’s. not. a. poll.

The ‘sample size’ is ridiculous... beyond a joke
There’s no possible geographical generalisation
There’s no reported margin of error
There’s no selection randomisation
There’s no reported question wording
There’s no methodological detail

It’s heiferdust! 😂