They are voting on Jackson today...

@SmoothKnight She can define it, dumbass. It was a gotcha question, like asking a right winger if they would support gun control if it would reduce school shootings.

@LeopoldBloom She did not define it, BUT she did defer the determination of gender to biologists, which means it is genetic and not just whatever you decide you are. BTW, leftists go out of their way to encourage school shootings. I would definitely support CCP for all teachers, which we already know reduces school shootings. Do you support that?

@SmoothKnight Please, define it for us. We'll wait. Be sure to include all the socio-economic, sexual and reproductive as well as medico-legal aspects and consideration.

But as long as we're going to demand there's such an implicit difference between the sexes, that should mean hands off women's bodies [i]by all men and their legislation[/i]. Goose and gander.

@IronHamster

The point is, I don't need a biologist to define it for me, and neither does she.

@Graylight

You know the answer, you just don't like it, so you redefine it to suit your agenda.

Nice try though.

@SmoothKnight

@SmoothKnight it was a stupid question

@DIABLISS It was a dishonest answer. Justices should be above that, since their job involves finding truth. The truth is, boys have penises and girls have vaginas. If a woman is exposed by a man to his penis, that's no longer sexual harassment to Democrats. Eat your tolerance. Lol!

@IronHamster you are embarrassing

@DIABLISS So you think sexual harassment is a good thing? Nice of you to out yourself about that.

@IronHamster i was sexually harassed every place i worked