Oops

That seems nowhere near logical, but okay.

@boldtimer: ah .... boldtimer ... that intelligence thing again? ... so, my choice is being intelligent like you, and a loser ... or be like the other 85% of America ... winners

Sorry dude ... I like hanging with winners

@boldtimer: 2,800 counties went for Trump ... the facts dude ... Hillary picked up 88 cities and a handful of universities ... less than 400 counties ... a small fraction of what her husband got

An awesome groundswell performance by Trump supporters ... about 85% of the counties ... deal with it.

@questionWeaver: last time i checked there were only 196 countries in the world 🤔

@questionWeaver: Are sure we live in the same world? Bc as HowImetYourMother said there are only 196, stop lying.

@offingg: maybe he's from a planet so far where there's thousands of countries 😜

The US has 3,144 counties ... not countries ... Trump won about 2,800 Hillary won 300 and change.

Half her popular vote was from IL, NY and CA ... .... mostly in just a few zip codes ... she only won 6 of NYs 40+ counties

Bunch of city people voted for her ... it could never be considered the voice of America

At best, Hillary represented the urban choice ... the deep city dwellers

The people who live out in the open air voted Trump.

It is not a good trend for a party ... Gore won 1,000 counties ... Obama won 600 counties ... Hillary won less than 400 counties

This really was the voice of suburbs and rural America ... the wide swath was Trump

@questionWeaver: aah my bad sorry i read wrong ✌

@HowIMetYourMother: no problem ... no harm ... no foul

@questionWeaver:

@offingg: This whole red herring about counties ignores the fact that only about 24% of Americans voted for Trump and about 2.5 million MORE Americans voted for Hilary so the notion that Trumo supporters comprise anywhere near 85% of the population is an absurdist fiction cooked up by people who are either actively dissembling or are themselves totally gullible when it comes to the lies of others. QuestionWeaver belongs firmly in the former group as he is routinely full of it.