Politics & News

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

White House Covering Up 48,000 Documents on SCOTUS Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson

Senate confirmation hearings for Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson began Monday morning.

Senate Judiciary ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-IA) on Monday revealed the White House is covering up 48,000 documents on Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Grassley expressed his disappointment for being unable to obtain Judge Jackson’s documents from her time as the Vice Chair of the US Sentencing Commission that are required to be released.

Democrats are stonewalling GOP efforts to obtain Jackson’s documents.

[quote]That doesn't look suspicious at all![/quote]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ElwoodBlues · M

President Trump will not release more than 100,000 pages of records from Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh’s tenure in the George W. Bush White House, claiming they would be covered by executive privilege.
[sep]
SOURCE: [b]https://www.chicagotribune.com/nation-world/ct-trump-kavanaugh-white-house-records-20180901-story.html[/b]
[sep]

ididntknow · 51-55, M

@ElwoodBlues

ElwoodBlues · M

@ididntknow What if I told you you know nothing about me or about science?

[b][u]UPDATE:[/u][/b]
LOL!!! You don't even know how to spell Fauci🤣🤣

ididntknow · 51-55, M

@ElwoodBlues Are you Dr Fauchi, is that it 🤔

Budwick · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues [quote]What if I told you you know nothing about me[/quote]

Anyone familiar with the political posts here on SW knows everything they need to know about you.

You are rude
You are biased beyond reason
You are predictable
You have an exaggerated opinion of yourself

Then then are some really unlikable traits as well that I won't embarrass you with.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Budwick Translation: you can't refute my data and my logic so you resort to personal attacks, [b]LOL!!![/b]

Budwick · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues [quote]Translation: you can't refute my data...[/quote]

That response speaks to your predictability.

ElwoodBlues · M

Translation: I don't like the person posting, so, by right-wing "logic" I can ignore all the data and facts they post, [b]ROTFL!!![/b]

@Budwick Don't ever stop searching for excuses to maintain your closed mind! [i]LOL!!![/i]

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

ElwoodBlues · M

@Budwick
President Trump will not release more than 100,000 pages of records from Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh’s tenure in the George W. Bush White House, claiming they would be covered by executive privilege.
SOURCE: [b]https://www.chicagotribune.com/nation-world/ct-trump-kavanaugh-white-house-records-20180901-story.html[/b]

Budwick · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues [quote]President Trump will not release more than 100,000 pages of records from Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh’s tenure in the George W. Bush White House, claiming they would be covered by executive privilege.[/quote]

So, deal with it, get over it, suck it up Nancy, grow a pair and STFU.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Budwick
[quote]n Monday revealed the White House is covering up 48,000 documents on Ketanji Brown Jackson.[/quote]

So, deal with it, get over it, suck it up Nancy, grow a pair and STFU.

[big]ROTFL!!![/big]

Budwick · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues For national security?
I think not.
More to protect a stupid appointment by stupid senators.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Budwick Who said "national security"?
You made that up. Try again.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues [quote]Who said "national security"? [/quote]

I did.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Budwick Are you drunk? You're trying to counter arguments no one is making, [b]LOL!!![/b]

Budwick · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues You are denying that you have a hard drive full of leftist propaganda ready to paste into discussion threads?

ElwoodBlues · M

@Budwick Yes. And I'm further claiming that your head is filled with misinformation; much of it antique.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues [quote]I'm further claiming that your head is filled with misinformation; much of it antique.[/quote]

Well, I have read a lot of your crap recently.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Budwick LOL!!! You missed the word "sntique" [b]LOL!!![/b]

And no, you clearly don't read it very well because you respond based on misunderstanding what is written.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues "sntique" ?