This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Graylight · 51-55, F
And in record time, Taylor-Greene submitted his name for Congressional Gold Medal, reserved for the country “to express public gratitude for distinguished contributions, dramatize the virtues of patriotism, and perpetuate the remembrance of great events (Congressional Research Service)."
1-25 of 37
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Graylight Republicans consider the vigilante killing of others and hunting humans to be a patriotic act worthy of great gratitude. The killings will be celebrated for a long time as an example of killing with impunity.
Pfuzylogic · M
@Graylight
It only shows that kids will come in to play cops and robbers when the Kenosha police are afraid to “protect and serve”. That town needs some real police. If they are paid it is way too much.
It only shows that kids will come in to play cops and robbers when the Kenosha police are afraid to “protect and serve”. That town needs some real police. If they are paid it is way too much.
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@windinhishair Your words would have impact if your whole narrative wasn't based on lies.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Oberon1 Come on, Puck, you know you love vigilante killings, and always have. It appeals to your warped sense of "justice" in which victims of executions deserve their own fates.
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@windinhishair Yeah.......well, I have to admit, it is very Darwinian to chase a guy with a locked and loaded AR15 and try to kill him! Legally Kyle defended himself, but scientifically, 'natural selection' was occurring and was recorded.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Oberon1 I accept the not guilty verdict, but I don't pretend that Rittenhouse was innocent as you do. Rittenhouse was illegally armed, and crossed state lines with the intent of hunting human beings he saw as deserving of being killed. Once he put himself in position to do so, he was legally entitled under existing law to defend himself. If Rittenhouse had been killed after discharging his weapon, his killer(s) would have also been justified in self-defense. It is a tragic episode all the way around, and Rittenhouse is not someone to be celebrated.
Natural selection occurs all the time. Just look at how it is weeding out the morally weak anti-vaxxers.
Natural selection occurs all the time. Just look at how it is weeding out the morally weak anti-vaxxers.
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@windinhishair You are basing everything on lies. Rittenhouse was NOT illegally armed. That was established early on.
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@windinhishair
Natural selection occurs all the time. Just look at how it is weeding out the morally weak anti-vaxxers.
Gee! Why does Florida have the lowest infection rate?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Pfuzylogic · M
@Oberon1
Maybe they ignore the dumb@$$ on top?
Maybe they ignore the dumb@$$ on top?
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Oberon1 On a one-inch technicality, in Wisconsin the weapon was not illegal, as a result of poor drafting of the law. But the weapon he possessed was illegal in Illinois, where he brought it from, so yes, it is correct to call it an illegal weapon.
The virus has been attacking solid red areas of the country disproportionately for months, killing primarily the unvaccinated. I assume you have noticed that once or twice. Definitely natural selection at work.
The virus has been attacking solid red areas of the country disproportionately for months, killing primarily the unvaccinated. I assume you have noticed that once or twice. Definitely natural selection at work.
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@windinhishair You don't understand law at all, do you?
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Oberon1 Far better than you, obviously.
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@windinhishair
Far better than you, obviously.
You are adorable! Kyle won the case. How can you be so completely silly?
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Oberon1 Kyle winning his case proves nothing about your knowledge of the law. In fact, you've demonstrated limited knowledge and understanding in the past. Did his win in court also convey a law degree upon you? Interesting.
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@windinhishair
In fact, you've demonstrated limited knowledge and understanding in the past.
Really? Do tell.1-25 of 37