So what did we learn from the Rittenhouse trial?
Because it feels like the lesson is 'shoot back'. Is the law really going to rule "Last one alive is innocent"?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
Ugh, no. The lesson is to stop listening to sensationalized media, your like minded friends, and your social media followers and challenge yourself to keep an open mind and read, listen or watch other perspectives to what you already believe and make up your own mind as to what is true.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@SatanBurger Correct. Dead people generally stay dead. What is your point?
SW-User
@SatanBurger Kind of like the dead people Biden relied on for vites?
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@SatanBurger Ahhh......ad absurdum! Not really a good choice, but whatever puts milk on your Cheerios!
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@SW-User Kind of like how that's totally not true?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/did-dead-people-vote-for-joe-biden-jon-keller-answers-your-questions/ar-BB1eazNN
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/did-dead-people-vote-for-joe-biden-jon-keller-answers-your-questions/ar-BB1eazNN
Ah yes, one of the more popular false claims still being touted by election result deniers. This is an old red herring. A study by the conservative Heritage Foundation in 2019 found only 19 cases of someone voting in the name of a dead person over the preceding two decades. There has been no confirmed evidence of it happening last fall. And the one specific claim offered by the Trump campaign – about a Pennsylvania woman who died before election day but still voted – turned out to be a legal mail-in ballot sent in by her family after she passed away.
By the way, the woman was a Trump supporter.
By the way, the woman was a Trump supporter.