This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
bijouxbroussard · F
Agreed. He took an automatic weapon and drove to a BLM rally. Clearly, since he’s [b]not[/b] a BLM supporter, his intention was violence directed against those who were. There is no justice in being rewarded for "solving" a problem [b]you[/b] created, by killing people and then claiming you thought you were in danger.
Pfuzylogic · M
@bijouxbroussard
It was a shame that vigilantes were allowed to roam the street because the Police were afraid to control the environment.
It was a shame that vigilantes were allowed to roam the street because the Police were afraid to control the environment.
bijouxbroussard · F
@Pfuzylogic One of the things witnesses at the rally mentioned was that the police were joking and chatting with him, unconcerned about his presence with an assault weapon. I’m reasonably certain that a 17 year old black kid walking up with an AR-15 wouldn’t have received as cordial a reception.
Pfuzylogic · M
@bijouxbroussard
It is definitely the “good ole boy” racist network where violations such as obvious misdemeanors are overlooked especially if one is patrolling where they (the police) should be when they “protect and serve” instead of hiding out on the peripheral.
It is definitely the “good ole boy” racist network where violations such as obvious misdemeanors are overlooked especially if one is patrolling where they (the police) should be when they “protect and serve” instead of hiding out on the peripheral.
