Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

September 17, 1939. You're Ignacy Mościcki and You've Just Been Informed a Time-Traveler Has Arrived From the Future.

Poll - Total Votes: 2
at Nazi Germany
at the U.S.S.R.
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
You've been given (1) one-megaton nuclear-tipped missile with a 1980 state-of-the-art internal tracking guidance system, accurate to within 3/10ths of a mile. But only one.

Do you fire it at your invaders to the west or those to the east?
If he knew all of the unfolding of history...neither.

Destroying the USSR would mean that the Nazis could easily get oil they would need, and would be free to concentrate on Britain. The fall of England would deprive any more remote combatants (e.g., the US) from a ready-made, forward base, and would allow the Nazis to consolidate power throughout Europe, North Africa, etc.

Destroying the Nazis might have allowed the USSR to take over much of Europe...

Defeating the Nazis helped to create a better world, including getting the US out of its crazy stupor of being unwilling to engage the international community.

And reading tea leaves is dangerous.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@SomeMichGuy
If he knew all of the unfolding of history...

...he'd learn that 1/5 of the population of his nation would be killed in the war.

Dropping the bomb on Nazi Germany would likely cause Stalin to hit the pause button.

The USSR within a few months had difficulty just in taking on Finland. They were in absolutely NO POSITION "to take over much of Europe in September 1939."

It would almost surely have caused the German military to overthrow the Nazi government.
@beckyromero Thanks for the info; I'll have to look more closely at that.

It's my guess that a guy willing to let 20 million of his people starve (Stalin) would be happy to use them as fodder...and if he could take fields and factories...he'd come out ahead.

If Berlin had been bombed somewhere over the Reichstag, followed by, say, Essen or shipyards/docks, there would be at least a few major areas of questions

1) Where would the military planners/heads have been? If mostly in Berlin, are there people left who could effectively do as you suggest? And what they were thinking in Sept. 1939 v. late 1944/1945?

2) Remember that the use of the bomb on Japan shocked the psyche of the Japanese. What if the same happened to Germany? A dazed, undirected Germany is very different from a clear, directed Germany. There could be an opportunity for France, Britain, for the USSR, etc., to try to move on and take assets from a Germany in shock...or at least try to destroy, say, the Krupp arms works, shipyards, etc.

3) If Germany *were* in shock, with the top heads of the Nazi monster destroyed, would the government even exist or continue?

Speculating is intriguing by far from certain.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@SomeMichGuy

There were enough high-ranking officers in the Germany military who would have been in a position to overthrown the Nazi government. They would not all have been in Berlin. And Berlin need not necessarily been the target of a Polish nuclear attack.

France actually briefly invaded Germany in the west. With a nuke dropping somewhere in Germany and the Allies invading from the west, the Nazis would have been, well, kaput.

An immediately threat of a nuclear missile attack on Moscow or St. Petersburg surely would have given Stalin pause and time for the Polish army to re-deploy troops to the eastern front.

The Soviets in September 1939 were in no position to take on the Poles, French and Brits. They had their hands full in a few months with just the Finns.
i'm not surprised nobody paid attention to this, it's way beyond the mental capacity of everyone here. they prefer to answer questions like, "should i eat mcdonalds or cook at home today ? 🤔"
@GlueGun lol Yes, but read the OP's background.

 
Post Comment