What are the criteria for proving that a vote was false or fraudulent?

I understand that some Republicans believe that Democrats only won the election due to fraud so my question is;
What criteria are used to prove that a vote was cast by someone who didn’t exist?
Do they use your birthday?
Your home address?
Your social security number?

And how many fraudulent votes that match the criteria for being fraudulent have been found so far?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

A good indication might be more ballots than voters....

justanothername · 51-55, M

@hippyjoe1955 dont you mean
More voters than ballots? And how did they prove this?

I ask how they proved this because no one has come up with any numbers so far despite all the vote counting that has been happening.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@justanothername Well it is pretty basic math. If there are 100,000 voters in a district and there are 105,000 ballots....

justanothername · 51-55, M

@hippyjoe1955 so I’m taking that it can only ever be 1 ballot per vote?

So which districts have been found to be more ballots than votes?

Do you have to register a ballot in order to cast a vote?

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@justanothername Lots of them. Try doing a little research. I don't have the time to go over that old ground again.

justanothername · 51-55, M

@hippyjoe1955 so does that mean they consider any district with more ballots cast than the equal number of corresponding votes to be fraudulent?

I’m mainly asking so I can get a basic understanding of how the vote count is validated.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@justanothername Wouldn't that be the ONLY logical conclusion?

justanothername · 51-55, M

@hippyjoe1955 I would imagine so. I just haven’t seen any numbers to say which districts had actual fraudulent votes that didn’t match with ballots that were cast.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@justanothername there were quite a number of them. Then there is the small matter of ballots showing up long after the ballots had all been collected. Also there is that one video of the boxes of mystery ballots being pulled out from under the table after the building was cleared. Some of those ballots were run through the counter three times. Hmmmm

OggggO · 36-40, M

@hippyjoe1955 [quote]I don't have the time to go over that old ground again.[/quote]
Convenient, since it never fucking happened.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@OggggO If you never look you will never find. Going to suck to be you when the evidence is revealed and you are completely ignorant of the facts. In the mean time as my old high school used to say the first person who resorts to profanity loses the debate. You lose. Have a nice oblivious life.

OggggO · 36-40, M

@hippyjoe1955 Burden of proof is on the claimant, as always.
[quote]In the mean time as my old high school used to say the first person who resorts to profanity loses the debate. You lose.[/quote]
Aww, sweetheart, this isn't highschool. No one fucking cares if we swear.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@OggggO I don't care what language you use either. I just know that if you have to resort to profanity you are no longer worthy of debate. You haven't got a clue and it shows in your choice of language.

OggggO · 36-40, M

@hippyjoe1955 I don't [i]have[/i] to resort to profanity, I just [i]chose[/i] to because it gets the damn point across. It's called emphasis.