This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
GailCob · 61-69, F
In a lifetime of collecting false analogies, I would have to say that this comparison is the most profoundly silly one I have yet come across.
And it is just possible your reference to 'slimy creatures' betrays a hint of bias leading to your inane comparison.
And it is just possible your reference to 'slimy creatures' betrays a hint of bias leading to your inane comparison.
beckyromero · 36-40, FVIP
@GailCob
I guess actually critiqing the analogy is too difficult for you, so you instead dismiss it out of hand.
Most creatures without backbones can be considered "slimy."
In a lifetime of collecting false analogies, I would have to say that this comparison
I guess actually critiqing the analogy is too difficult for you, so you instead dismiss it out of hand.
And it is just possible your reference to 'slimy creatures' ...
Most creatures without backbones can be considered "slimy."