This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Carla · 61-69, F
Some of the questions you pose are valid. Not many, some.
This is an example of one of your more absurd.
The jury was vetted and properly instructed.
They, like the rest of the world, watched a police officer, aided by his colleagues, murder a subdued suspect. Obvious if only by watching the last minutes when it was reported to chauvin that floyd had no pulse.
The rest of the entire incident has no relevance.
This is an example of one of your more absurd.
The jury was vetted and properly instructed.
They, like the rest of the world, watched a police officer, aided by his colleagues, murder a subdued suspect. Obvious if only by watching the last minutes when it was reported to chauvin that floyd had no pulse.
The rest of the entire incident has no relevance.
Carla · 61-69, F
@MasterLee oh, come on...there were cameras everywhere. Time stamped video.
You simply cannot scream fake news, "they" altered the film, "they" created the narrative, bla, blah, blah.
Chauvin was told that floyd has no pulse. He did not move, respond or react. End of story.
Well, other than he and his cronies were the reason he had no pulse.
You simply cannot scream fake news, "they" altered the film, "they" created the narrative, bla, blah, blah.
Chauvin was told that floyd has no pulse. He did not move, respond or react. End of story.
Well, other than he and his cronies were the reason he had no pulse.
This message was deleted by its author.