Why do republicans think its ok to allow guns for terrorists and other demented people ?

considering the latest shooting at a hospital, shouldnt guns be restricted to people with some responsibility ?

why do republicans want crimnals to attack peaceful citizens ?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M

Here's a logical approach: regulate cars like guns.

You need to go for training, write a test and pass to get your license.
Once you get the gun, it needs to be registered.
If you have a history of reckless behaviour or you do not meet the physical or mental requirements to own a gun, you shouldn't have one.

With that being said I'm against all this nonsense of banning "assault weapons". Better sights or pistol grips don't make a rifle more dangerous. Most guns including pistols are semi-automatic. Actual assault rifle that are fully automatic or selective fire have been banned for civilian use in the US since the 80s.

I hate that the left is associated with banning guns. I'm a far left Anarchist, and myself and Marxists are AGAINST disarming the working class and only arming the police. With police's wanton abuse of minorities, particularly black people, I definitely don't think they should be the only ones with guns.