This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Pretty much any agenda-based representation of journalism that conditions you to adopt certain perspectives instead of providing a broad journalistic investigation that encourages the viewer/reader to formulate their own informed perspectives.
Archtiger · 31-35, M
@KrackerBash Isn’t that subjective in nature?
@Archtiger No
Archtiger · 31-35, M
@KrackerBash No? Brietbart to Trump supporters is journalistic investigation. Consult with Texchick or IStillMissEP. Do you agree with them?
@Archtiger If Brietbart fits the description, it is what it is. People are comforted by their fake news outlets across the political spectrum.
Archtiger · 31-35, M
@KrackerBash Thus, it’s subjective. Thank you.
@Archtiger Your post was subjective from the beginning. You clearly got offended by some users I don’t even know and wanted validation to look down on them. Sorry I fell for it.
Archtiger · 31-35, M
@KrackerBash Every post is subjective and I’ve always looked down on Trump supporters, that’s nothing new. To take offense would make me no better than them.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Archtiger News is composed of facts. Facts are not subjective. Never. They exist independently and separately from opinions. The method of journalism - to use the term loosely - the what creates subjectivity.
Is it fake news or subjective that Trump stood up one day and uttered words that were then repeated verbatim? No; that's the description of what actually happened. Now, does CNN's incessant and unwavering coverage of it as evidence of a man's state of mind define objectivity? Not even close. That's the converted hiring a choir to preach right back at them. The facts aren't the issue - it's the context and format in which they're presented that create subjectivity. (The same is true across Fox, Breitbart, Msnbc, Newsmax and others).
Is it fake news or subjective that Trump stood up one day and uttered words that were then repeated verbatim? No; that's the description of what actually happened. Now, does CNN's incessant and unwavering coverage of it as evidence of a man's state of mind define objectivity? Not even close. That's the converted hiring a choir to preach right back at them. The facts aren't the issue - it's the context and format in which they're presented that create subjectivity. (The same is true across Fox, Breitbart, Msnbc, Newsmax and others).
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment