What are the real reasons Trump lost the 2020 election?
Because this voter fraud/dead voters thing is bullshït.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SteelHands · 61-69, M
I'm up to seven verified cases of political hijinx including postal officials tampering with ballots, voting machine irregularities, ballot chain of custody illegalities, fake dead people mailings and lopsided media and internet reporting on the actual voting process.
Here's just one of my today's views of witness testimony.
[youtube=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-0IJ8amYwKg]
Here's just one of my today's views of witness testimony.
[youtube=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-0IJ8amYwKg]
Northwest · M
@SteelHands Awesome. Why don't you turn it all in to the courts, the FBI, heck even Barr, he said he couldn't find any irregularities, but he's looking into complaints.
Today, the courts in Georgia dismissed yet another Trump case. That makes it something like 43 cases his legal team lost so far.
Come on, don't be a grinch, they need all the help they can get.
Today, the courts in Georgia dismissed yet another Trump case. That makes it something like 43 cases his legal team lost so far.
Come on, don't be a grinch, they need all the help they can get.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
@Northwest You'll think this is a game until you don't.
Northwest · M
@SteelHands [quote]You'll think this is a game until you don't.[/quote]
Not at all. Perhaps it's a game to you, but only a complete moron, at this point, would not be wondering why this mountain of evidence has not been turned over to the courts yet. They're really asking for it, but the Trump legal team fails to provide. Why?
Not at all. Perhaps it's a game to you, but only a complete moron, at this point, would not be wondering why this mountain of evidence has not been turned over to the courts yet. They're really asking for it, but the Trump legal team fails to provide. Why?
SteelHands · 61-69, M
@Northwest I'm going to ask you to not comment on any of my posts again.
You apparently have no recall process or are cherry picking which posts I make to ask the same questions I've already answered at length just to add to the noise.
You've been annoying in the past and your name calling again makes this necessary.
You apparently have no recall process or are cherry picking which posts I make to ask the same questions I've already answered at length just to add to the noise.
You've been annoying in the past and your name calling again makes this necessary.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@SteelHands You won't have a lot of people to talk too if you keep up this paste. But hey, I don't think you can connect to manny people annyway. 🤣
SteelHands · 61-69, M
@Kwek00 You're free to ignore what I write. In fact please do and you may also refrain from further insults against me on any of my comments.
Northwest · M
@SteelHands [quote]I'm going to ask you to not comment on any of my posts again.
You apparently have no recall process or are cherry picking which posts I make to ask the same questions I've already answered at length just to add to the noise.
You've been annoying in the past and your name calling again makes this necessary.[/quote]
This may come as a surprise to you, but I don't live to keep track of your posts.
Like it or not, you have no control over what I post. That is unless it's a thread you started. Then you delete my comments. As it stands, you have no control over what I post to this thread. It's really that simple.
My comment stands. Someone would have to be a fucking moron, not to question why this mountain of evidence, has not been turned over to the courts, as part of the 43 cases Trump has lost to date. If that's you, then it's good you recognized yourself.
You apparently have no recall process or are cherry picking which posts I make to ask the same questions I've already answered at length just to add to the noise.
You've been annoying in the past and your name calling again makes this necessary.[/quote]
This may come as a surprise to you, but I don't live to keep track of your posts.
Like it or not, you have no control over what I post. That is unless it's a thread you started. Then you delete my comments. As it stands, you have no control over what I post to this thread. It's really that simple.
My comment stands. Someone would have to be a fucking moron, not to question why this mountain of evidence, has not been turned over to the courts, as part of the 43 cases Trump has lost to date. If that's you, then it's good you recognized yourself.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@SteelHands I guess you are not a big fan of open forums 🤣. If you want to preach to the quire, you'll have to move somehwere else or start using the block button.
Northwest · M
@SteelHands [quote]I'm not playing your stupid game.
Go find someone else that refuses to see judicial political bias.
Get lost.[/quote]
It's a free country. That is until Trump manages to repeal Section 230. In the meanwhile, I will post whatever I like. You don't like it? I don't give a fuck.
Go find someone else that refuses to see judicial political bias.
Get lost.[/quote]
It's a free country. That is until Trump manages to repeal Section 230. In the meanwhile, I will post whatever I like. You don't like it? I don't give a fuck.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
@Kwek00 No I don't. You've proved yourself a troll.
Keep up the self drain. It's no skin off my nose, outsiders like you don't mean a thing.
Keep up the self drain. It's no skin off my nose, outsiders like you don't mean a thing.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@SteelHands Whenever you have all those sources on all those claims you make, just let me know okay?
SteelHands · 61-69, M
Northwest · M
@SteelHands [quote]Someone like you doesn't care about anything important.
That's not news to me.[/quote]
I'm sure you will present proof of that, right? 🤣
That's not news to me.[/quote]
I'm sure you will present proof of that, right? 🤣
Northwest · M
@SteelHands
[quote][b][i][u]Don't need to. You antifa / anarchist / BLM supporting types reveal it every time you write or talk.[/u][/i][/b][/quote]
🤣
[quote]At least you do to me.[/quote]
Which means absolutely nothing, coming from a guy who thinks a PR event is unimpeachable evidence.
[quote]Didn't I ask you to stop bothering me?[/quote]
Didn't I tell you to fuck off? I didn't? OK, fuck off, you're not a Jedi master and this is an open forum.
[quote][b][i][u]Don't need to. You antifa / anarchist / BLM supporting types reveal it every time you write or talk.[/u][/i][/b][/quote]
🤣
[quote]At least you do to me.[/quote]
Which means absolutely nothing, coming from a guy who thinks a PR event is unimpeachable evidence.
[quote]Didn't I ask you to stop bothering me?[/quote]
Didn't I tell you to fuck off? I didn't? OK, fuck off, you're not a Jedi master and this is an open forum.
Carla · 61-69, F
I've just read all of this. And maybe you have explained it before, but I'd like to read it...
Why are all of trumps cases being rejected for having no evidence, if people online have all of this evidence? You say judicial prejudice, but a large number of the judges were trump appointees.
How do you explain that? @SteelHands, all of the conspiracy theories about fraud and cheating have been found to be without merit.
It's silly to continue to give those theriores any more space.
Why are all of trumps cases being rejected for having no evidence, if people online have all of this evidence? You say judicial prejudice, but a large number of the judges were trump appointees.
How do you explain that? @SteelHands, all of the conspiracy theories about fraud and cheating have been found to be without merit.
It's silly to continue to give those theriores any more space.
Mikemcneil · 61-69, M
@SteelHands how did the dumb truck driver know all the postal votes were for Trump? The vast majority of postal votes were for Biden anyway. Why haven't you posted that video of Screechy Woman saying 120 percent and Sick Rudy telling her to shut up? Turns out CoVid isn't a hoax and Donny boy stiffed him again. So much winning 🥇 🤦♂️
