Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Wisconsin Recount - Results were accurate

Once again, another state recount, and more proof that the election results are accurate and that has been muliple votes fraud yet proven, or any of these other bullshit conspiracy theories.


All signs point to legal electoral college results being 306 Biden - 232 Trump

https://www.reuters.com/article/BigStory12/idUSKBN28802N
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
zerofuks2give · 41-45, M
I’m not saying that there was fraud, but if there was, a recount necessarily wouldn’t expose it. You would have to do an audit of all the votes to see if they were legitimate. I don’t think the question is are the vote totals accurate, it’s are the votes that were cast legal and legitimate?
Viper · M
@zerofuks2give actually every single part has been questioned, including the accurate of the totals, including some BS claims there were a major huge amount of extra votes for just Biden and not one else on the entire ballot. They have literally a conspiracy theory about everything.

You're right that a recount won't show everything.

But so far, zero proof of these massive claims, and lots of proof that the claims aren't adding up...
zerofuks2give · 41-45, M
@Viper if the government wanted to rig an election, they can do it in such a way that it could not be detected. I think all of the recounts are pointless, nothing is going to change
Viper · M
@zerofuks2give okay but why would the Republicans lead states such as GA rig the election for Biden?

And consider this would be illegal and the government makes lots of errors, clearly there would be errors to find, plus actual voting irregularities, which they found in other voting scandal such as the NC voter fraud.

And yet, they haven't found any of these, in any state, not even the Republicans lead and controlled states.
zerofuks2give · 41-45, M
@Viper So you’re saying there should naturally be errors and irregularities and they haven’t found any? Isn’t that suspicious in itself?
Viper · M
@zerofuks2give If that was the case, yes. But it's not the case.


They have said they have found errors and inconsistency on pace with the normal amount they would expect based upon normal Presidential Elections and with a higher than expected turnover.


But the closest thing to large fraud that has been pointed or with any proof was two election Republicans claiming that a sitting Republicans Senator was suggesting they get rid of legal votes. The Senator then claimed he didn't say anything wrong, and he called many of the heads of elections, naming a number including AZ, and AZ quickly came out and said that statement is false, she had not heard from the Senator at all.


Everything else, has been pretty much normal of any other US presidential election, except this one had higher turnout as people either really loved or really hated Trump.

[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2sLnYdkdpA]