This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Hikingguy · 56-60, M
Can this be verified and those ballots still be counted if this is true?
1-25 of 58
akindheart · 61-69, F
@Hikingguy in some states they are trying to cover up the deception. Georgia wanted to wipe the servers clean. this is terrible.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Hikingguy This is a bullshit conspiracy theory which was completely disproved by a hand recount. Unless they are going to argue magical physical ballots with magic ink that changes by itself altered that too.
akindheart · 61-69, F
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow are you nuts??? the recount is still going on. more testimony and more hearings. wake up.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow
More like the hand recounts were just a “hand job” effort to appear as if they were doing a thorough recount. They did not, however, as they will not allow signature matching to verify that all legal votes were counted, and all illegal votes were not.
More like the hand recounts were just a “hand job” effort to appear as if they were doing a thorough recount. They did not, however, as they will not allow signature matching to verify that all legal votes were counted, and all illegal votes were not.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@akindheart Nuts is the OAN conspiracy theories you keep pushing. The "testimonies" and lawsuits are being laughed out of court. They can't even manage to proof read their own legal documents correctly. The Trump legal team at last count were 1 for 39. They actually had one of their victories on procedure overturned. It is a joke. Even the owner of NewsMax said in an interview that they know this is bullshit but gaslighting Trump supporters is profitable.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Ambroseguy80 Oh look. More completely unsubstantiated conspiracies.
Viper · M
Things that did not actually happen can't be verified. Which is why they have failed to verify this over and over again.
In fact, they have proven it did not happen in all the areas they have recounted, as hand recounts confirmed by the voters before recounting has confirmed the votes match the paper audit trail which the voters confirmed.
But they've trying to ignore the paper audit trail, as they haven't been able to explain that into their audit.
As well as the number of votes have to match the number of voters they have had, which also matches.
So far... SO FAR... none of these conspiracy theories have held up, which is why Trump's acting lawyers have no put them into a court under his name.
And the items they have out into court under his name, have all been striking out, including with conservative judges that Trump himself appointed.
@Hikingguy
In fact, they have proven it did not happen in all the areas they have recounted, as hand recounts confirmed by the voters before recounting has confirmed the votes match the paper audit trail which the voters confirmed.
But they've trying to ignore the paper audit trail, as they haven't been able to explain that into their audit.
As well as the number of votes have to match the number of voters they have had, which also matches.
So far... SO FAR... none of these conspiracy theories have held up, which is why Trump's acting lawyers have no put them into a court under his name.
And the items they have out into court under his name, have all been striking out, including with conservative judges that Trump himself appointed.
@Hikingguy
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow nope. Just more of the same actuality.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Ambroseguy80 Exactly, more unsubstiated, rumour, conjecture and conspiracy. More of the same.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I said “actuality”. This is beyond theory buddy. When the evidence eventually gets shown, you’ll have your proof
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Ambroseguy80 No it is not. It isn't even a theory. It is at best rumour and conjecture. Even calling it a theory is too charitable.
There is no evidence and never has been. The Trump lawsuits are now at 1 and 39. Giuliani even said under oath this is not a fraud case. Funny how his tune changes the instant there is risk of being sanctioned by the court for lying.
There is no evidence and never has been. The Trump lawsuits are now at 1 and 39. Giuliani even said under oath this is not a fraud case. Funny how his tune changes the instant there is risk of being sanctioned by the court for lying.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow you’re the one calling it a theory. Not me!
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Ambroseguy80 I called it a conspiracy theory which is and always has been a term for crazy mad up shit.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow in your opinion. Lol
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Ambroseguy80 No, It is fact. There is literally nothing to support any of your claims and literally all the facts support my position. But if you want to take NewsMax talking heads who know they are lying to you at face value that is your prerogative I suppose.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow that’s for the court to decide. Not a bunch of liberals. And talk about LYING! What about all those mainstream media outlets who are completely IGNORING the story?
That shows that YOUR media outlets are doing more than just being objective middle ground reporters. Walter Cronkite is rolling over in his grave over the media
That shows that YOUR media outlets are doing more than just being objective middle ground reporters. Walter Cronkite is rolling over in his grave over the media
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Ambroseguy80 Typical. Anyone who doesn't lick Trump's boots is a liberal to you. 🤦♂️
And the courts are very decisively throwing this nonsense out. Hell some judges are even mocking the Trump legal team. Hell they can't even spellcheck their legal briefs so can you blame them?
And the courts are very decisively throwing this nonsense out. Hell some judges are even mocking the Trump legal team. Hell they can't even spellcheck their legal briefs so can you blame them?
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow
Sounds like some irresponsible judges that would do that. Must be liberal.
Hell some judges are even mocking the Trump legal team
Sounds like some irresponsible judges that would do that. Must be liberal.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Ambroseguy80 Nope. Just judges frustrated with having their time wasted with pointless lawsuits.
And typical simpleton who thinks anyone who doesn't kiss Trump's ass is a liberal. Good job proving you don't even understand what that word means. it also explains why you clowns are so easy for the Trump campaign to gaslight.
And typical simpleton who thinks anyone who doesn't kiss Trump's ass is a liberal. Good job proving you don't even understand what that word means. it also explains why you clowns are so easy for the Trump campaign to gaslight.
Viper · M
@Ambroseguy80 It was a conservative judge appointed by Trump that has made a ruling that one must state a specific incident and have proof, which Rudy Giuliani did not provide in the court case.
The Republicans claim they have proof, but so far, every judge ruling, even life long conservative judges that were conservative while Donald way donating money to the clintons... have so far ruled they have not bought any proof into their court rooms.
So if they do indeed have proof, while aren't they bringing not to the court rooms?
The Republicans claim they have proof, but so far, every judge ruling, even life long conservative judges that were conservative while Donald way donating money to the clintons... have so far ruled they have not bought any proof into their court rooms.
So if they do indeed have proof, while aren't they bringing not to the court rooms?
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow nothing about the sovereignty of our future elections should be construed as a “waste of time”. If there are serious allegations, the court should be concerned to hear them and rule on them fairly. Sounds like more kickbacks from Communist money instead. Enjoy your closed minded thinking.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@Viper nothing can be trusted with your leftist media reports. I’m sure the SCOTUS will get their proof
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Ambroseguy80 Except it has nothing to do with the sovereignty of the elections. Are you people even aware that court cases are public record? It is all nonsense and theatre. They have yet to make a serious allegation with any evidence to back it up. In some cases they don't even have standing.
Oh look now a random red scare conspiracy.
Closed minded? You are the one basically trying to claim the courts are now magically rigged too with no evidence.
Oh look now a random red scare conspiracy.
Closed minded? You are the one basically trying to claim the courts are now magically rigged too with no evidence.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Ambroseguy80 This is not "leftist media" which is a fiction but whatever. This is literally from the courts.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow
because Democrats are trying desperately to remove it all. But they have been sloppy and some evidence will be provided. I’m looking forward to 🍿 and SCOTUS in front of the fire.
They have yet to make a serious allegation with any evidence to back it up.
because Democrats are trying desperately to remove it all. But they have been sloppy and some evidence will be provided. I’m looking forward to 🍿 and SCOTUS in front of the fire.
1-25 of 58