This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Frank52 · 70-79, M
There's increasing piles of 'evidence' on this thread...day after day. All sourced with claims of witnesses to fraud. NOT ONE court case has got past first post. No fraud allegations have been presented to a court. Only Trump and his acolytes insist that there is anything seriously wrong with the voting machines without substantiated evidence.
Now the arguments start that the courts are biased.
They are. In favour of provable evidence and against rumour and gossip.
Now that Trump has conceded de facto that there is a new presidency coming, what is the point of trying to convince us there's fraud? Courts operating under the US Constitution not only can't be convinced that there were unsafe voting practices, but those who shout 'FRAUD!' are not even attempting to show the court there is. They must know they are shouting lies.
Now the arguments start that the courts are biased.

Now that Trump has conceded de facto that there is a new presidency coming, what is the point of trying to convince us there's fraud? Courts operating under the US Constitution not only can't be convinced that there were unsafe voting practices, but those who shout 'FRAUD!' are not even attempting to show the court there is. They must know they are shouting lies.
bookerdana · M
@Frank52 evidently they were bad,corrupt judges cuz..disagreed with Trumpy
