Can Trump supporters make up their mind?

One second they say they're winning. Next they claim it's all rigged. One or the other, people. It's not real hard.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

TexChik · F

Remember this guy? Khizr Kahn and his wife - the "Gold Star" family, who caused such a commotion denouncing Trump for his stand against Muslim immigration at the DNC Convention? Now we learn that not only did the Dems pay actors to fill up seats at their convention, but they paid Khan $25,000 to make that speech. (Which was, by the way, not written by him, but two DNC staffers). Remember the copy of Constitution he held up? (Bought by a staffer two hours before speech). And that's just the tip of the iceberg!.....

FIVE Gold Star families turned down the DNC's request to speak at the convention. Khan's law firm is in debt $1.7 million, and owes back taxes of over $850,000 plus penalties. (Which the IRS has put on hold since his convention speech). In addition, the DNC paid him a bonus of $175,000 for his "media effort." AND...CNN paid him over $100,000 for his interviews.

NOW who's dishonoring his son's memory? Talk about soulless.

[image deleted]
So now , if you were upset and lead to believe that Trump bashed a gold star family by the liberal media .... don't you feel used and foolish? Can you say RIGGED?

Pherick · 41-45, M

So they had a speech written (or helped written) for them, so what? This was a major speech at a DNC convention why is it even surprising he might have had speechwriters look it over? So a pocket Constitution was given to him? So what?

http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/03/khizr-khans-connections/
http://www.snopes.com/khizr-khan-375000-clinton-foundation/
https://www.quora.com/Was-Khizr-Khan%E2%80%99s-speech-written-by-writers-at-the-DNC-and-was-he-paid-25-000-by-them

Love to see some sources for what you are claiming.

TexChik · F

@Pherick: would you believe that there is a snopes denial for all of Hillary's wrong doings? Libs lying for libs ... who knew ?

Pherick · 41-45, M

@TexChik: Again, even if Snopes is lying, which its not. You still haven't posted any sources FOR this to be true.

TexChik · F

@Pherick: Hahahahaha ... it's not ?

Pherick · 41-45, M

@TexChik: That's what I thought, these fantastical stories and never any proof for them. Good try.

TexChik · F

@Pherick: isn't that what you tards always tell yourself ... what alinski has taught you... when faced with the truth lie , deny, and discredit. Doesn't matter what references I cite , you tards have a lie ready for it . So I don't bother

Pherick · 41-45, M

@TexChik: I am somewhat amazed you can function in normal society. You post a story that makes pretty outrageous claims and then when asked for proof, you verbally attack the person asking for proof.

You haven't presented any truth yet, so when you do, (you won't but I hold out hope) I can then look into it.

Oh the references you site matter to me, despite your horrible attitude toward me.

TexChik · F

@Pherick: after years of dealing with libs... the only answer you get is look it up your self ... but then I don't run home to momma snopes ...

Pherick · 41-45, M

@TexChik: LOL, thanks for again proving that the Right, for whatever reason, LOVES to post crap that they can't back up.

I did look it up, and found nothing. Good try and better luck next time.

TexChik · F

@Pherick: don't need to back up the truth tard... but you need to lie about it

CassandraFemale17 · 26-30, F

What a series of lies. Is this your novel, or did you blindly copy and paste it from a fool?

Pherick · 41-45, M

@TexChik: Awww you are just so cute in your complete inability to post sources and just call me "tard" like that proves anything but your lack of education and wit.

TexChik · F

@Pherick: sorry tard