Is Barack Obama

@JT123

@JT123 [image]

@JT123

@jackjjackson 🙌🏻😊😍🤣

😉 @SW-User

@jackjjackson 😉😊

@JT123 Says the man who support a leader with no fewer than 21 separate sexual assault and harassments allegations. Hmm.

Trump's disfavor is not a matter of opinion. This is quantifiable by numbers. You all shout loudly, but there are only so many of you. Hence, the elevated sound. Wow, are you ever going to be hateful with another 8 year democracy.

@JT123

@JT123

Reasonable questions and conclusively establishes that you’re a douchebag. @RedBaron

@jackjjackson Who pissed in your cornflakes?

@RedBaron

@SW-User Considering his dirty business is coming to light he should lay low and shut his arrogant mouth!

@JT123 His lying lips...

@JAYS21

What’s the correct shit in your opinion please? @CountScrofula

@jackjjackson Insane amounts of extrajudicial murder, the destruction of Libya, responding to the 2008 financial crisis by doubling down on all the shit that caused it in the first place, mass deportations, a mealy-mouthed corporate health care solution that was doomed to fail, etc...

He sold himself as this inspirational figure but just kinda maintained empire. He made liberals feel good about themselves, but he didn't actually do a lot of good.

Quite disappointing based on what could have been. @CountScrofula

]@TexChik

@SevIsPamprinYouAlways

[image deleted]@TexChik

Yes,@monte3. You're right. The whole deep state is goin' down. Biden was right there with 'em. Ya know Rudy has all the Ukrainian info. And now this? He is such a crook. Biggest political criminals in history!🙄

New Jersey will be turned into a prison camp! Only “true Christians” are exempt!
Ahh the winds of impotent rage.... @Carla

@monte3 !!😄

@monte3 I can agree to disagree with anyone...but nobody will force me ...

@SW-User I just want to know what “ JW” refers to. Because me first guess is a little disturbing..
You certainly don’t have to talk to anyone you don’t want to..

@monte3 Jehovah’s Witness... it’s his prerogative to believe as he wishes but he keeps on and on and on and I won’t tolerate it. We had both spoke what we think...it was time to give it a break!

@JT123 They will and that’s why I believe it won’t happen that he has to pay...

@SW-User Trump made it clear he's going to expose Obama's criminal actions. I believe he will. Someone has to pay for that 3 year clown show the Rats put Trump through. Now we have real criminals and real crimes. Grab you popcorn and enjoy the show 🍿☺️

@JT123 I’m not arguing that he won’t expose. I’m arguing that he won’t pay for it...

Writing out of your ass again I see Burnsie

With the recent declassification of the Nunes and Grassley memos from the House and Senate, in this case the putative crimes are far more serious than a failed attempt to bug the private office of a political party. These crimes have the potential to shake American confidence in otherwise prestigious institutions like the FBI, and the sanctity of our constitutional rights as citizens, especially those afforded by the Fourth Amendment, specifically protection “against unreasonable searches and seizures” or warrants being issued without “probable cause.”
Despite the months it has taken for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and Senate Judiciary Committee to investigate the matters before them and declassify their initial findings, we are still just at the beginning of knowing how broad and deep a scandal we face. Nevertheless, the facts already laid out by the memos are shocking enough by themselves and, specifically, in the consequences they may have for all Americans.

We already know that during the 2016 presidential election, the FBI and Justice Department acquired a secret warrant to spy on U.S. citizen Carter Page, a volunteer adviser to the Trump campaign. The warrant application was based on an “opposition research” file paid for by the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton through her lawyer. This fact, that the file was paid for by the candidate and party running against Donald Trump, was not disclosed by the FBI or Justice Department to the secret FISA court judge to whom that warrant application was made.

It was also never disclosed that the author of the file was a former British intelligence officer with close ties to Moscow, who had been deemed by the FBI to be “unreliable” and who was known — at the highest levels of the Justice Department — to be “desperate” to ensure that Trump never became president. In other words, the FBI and Justice Department knowingly hid exculpatory evidence from the surveillance court in order to be able to start spying on a member of the Trump team.

Add to this what we now know about the contents of the file compiled by Christopher Steele, that its salacious accusations came from Russian officials and, in part, as Trey Gowdy has intimated, from none other than Sidney Blumenthal, the closest of Clinton’s confidantes, and the full scenario appears undeniable. One candidate for president managed to leverage elements of the federal law enforcement and intelligence communities to illegally spy on the campaign running against her.

If we add to this the countless anti-Trump text messages that have been released between key members of the FBI team investigating both the Clinton “servergate” case and the accusations of “Russia collusion” by Trump associates, and it is easy to understand why half a dozen senior FBI agents and Justice Department officials have been “relieved” or reassigned in recent weeks.

There is a special reason why America never created a domestic spying agency, even after Sept. 11, 2001, when the calls for such a body were loudest. There is something in the genesis of our republic that rejects the idea of permanent “political police” surveilling our fellow countrymen. That is why, ironically, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was originally created in 1978 in response to the abuses of the Nixon years.

Spying on Americans was to be sporadic and done on a case by case basis, with each target’s approval having to be justified in front of a special FISA judge. When political motivations lie behind such approval and that fact is hidden from the authority which grants it, all Americans are endangered. Working for a mainstream political candidate must never be the metric for whether the state can spy on you, whether you are a Republican or a Democrat. That way lies tyranny.




@Burnley123

@jackjjackson One again, you can't source any of that.

Its a story. Its a fiction narrative that you wanna believe.

Sure I can. I didn’t write it that’s for sure. You got nothing. The other commentators have made you appear foolish yet again. @Burnley123

@MartinTheFirst PS...I hate nobody but lies will be out in the open... I’m not a dumb dog too dumb too bark. Now kindly go away... with your JW beliefs... I’ve heard you and youve heard me. We flat disagree why keep on?

@SW-User You're the one commenting on my comment ma'am. I'm not going to go away from my own comment.

@JT123

@SW-User