Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why do I think we need to adopt a war economy?

This is UK context though it relates to elsewhere. By 'war economy' I mean sonething like the state interventionist model which Britain and others adopted in WW2.

Because of the virus, we are already entering a major recession. Society enters semi lockdown so that people will be spending less and spending on different things.

If you work in the public sector or in an industry which deals in essential services, then you should be ok. Likewise if your company does a lot of trade in deliveries.

This is not everyone though. Lots of people work in hospitality or in service sector industries where demand has just collapsed and will stay collapsed for a few months. These businesses are already going under or laying off staff. Altohgether, this is perhaps ten percent of the workforce.

It means huge government welfare payments from the government but still not enough for families to put food on the table. There is no way that the market can adapt overnight to fill these jobs at this time so their could be an unemployment crisis to compound the medical crisis.

Our government needs to do more direct investment in the economy. Denmark is guaranteeing the wages of 75% of private workers and even Trump's thousand dollar payment to US citizens is more than our government is doing. All they are doing for businesses is to give them loans. What use is a loae if you have no customers for four months?

We need to nationalise key industries to keep people in work. This also makes sense because the virus will stop us importing a lot of things we need. A good place to start would be for the government to convert factories to make ventilators which hospitals are despertely short of. Charities are really struggling at a time when we need them more than ever. This is also a placen where government can, and should, intervene to create jobs.

I think governments of the world will all be forced to transition to something like a war time economy anyway. My worry is that some will be doing it as a reactive, not proactive, way of coping with the crisis. We need to do this now, not in two months time.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Normal capitalist rhetoric: Command economies suck and don't work.


Capitalist rhetoric in a crisis: Quick! implement a command economy!
Lhayezee · 26-30, F
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow That's the point though. A command economy DOES work in a crisis but in normal times, when even a quite communitarian society is necessarily a little bit more diverse in the way different people pull, it's not so good. We don't need 400 types of cheese [i]right now[/i] (well ok bad example; we always need cheese....we don't need 400 types of toilet paper then)...and it's quite sensible for the state to mastermind cheese/toilet paper/vaccine/whatever production, as may be needed in the crisis.

People will put up with the dreariness of command in times of crisis. When it's over (which it will be at some point), we'll want our brie and Cushelle back.
@Lhayezee Except a capitalist market economy only works for a small minority at the best of times and crashes like clockwork every 5 to 7 years even without a crisis and has for 300 years. There are other bits nobody likes to talk about like how it literally requires homeless people and poverty to function. I am sure absolute monarchy in a feudal society appeared very functional if you were part of the group who benefited most.
Lhayezee · 26-30, F
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow it quite literally does not require homelessness.

Homelessness MAY be a symptom of totally unregulated capitalism. The problem is, if you will, a bug which regulated capitalism/market economy tries to fix.

It's certainly not a problem solved by the state telling me what brand of butter I can buy.
@Lhayezee A command economy is not a cliche.

And actually it does require things like homelessness. What happens if everyone has a home? Instant housing market crash. You can't have a market without demand.
@Lhayezee I also find the absurd idea that a monopoly is only bad when it is public(government)kind of funny.
Lhayezee · 26-30, F
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I wouldn't confuse monopolists or oligarchs with capitalists though. It's just that right now the latter has been taken over by the former. No capitalist or any sort except the monopolist and oligarch set would until the 1980s have said that market regulation was bad.