Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should Democrat Leadership Be Punished ??

[b]Should Democrat Leadership Be Punished ??[/b]


Should Democrat Leadership Be Punished for perpetrating lies, making shit up, attempting to over turn the last election and interfere / meddle in the 2020 election?

Schiff's 'rock solid' evidence against Trump never surfaced. None of the 'witnesses' witnessed anything. All the real evidence points to the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong - yet the left persists. Obviously, their motivation has nothing to do with any wrong doing.

These false distractions have been the focal point for democrats and the media for three years now! The topic had a negative effect on America in many respects.

I don't know if it's a crime for politicians to lie - I suppose if it were, DC would be a ghost town. But, this rises to a level that in my opinion can not be ignored or allowed to happen again. In my opinion the people that put us through this mess need to be punished - severely.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Carla · 61-69, F
oh, come on.
You just cant be serious.
You must see the hypocrisy in that statement.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla [quote]You must see the hypocrisy in that statement.[/quote]

Make sure you know what hypocrisy means before you explain where you saw it in 'my statement'.
Carla · 61-69, F
@Budwick oh, I know the definition.
Just the thought that you can ignore your masters thousands of lies, makes me believe that you just dont care what he does or doesnt do.
Schiff hasn't lied about the evidence. You just dont care.
I expect you think Bolton is lying too. To sell books, right. That's what dear leader said. So that must be true.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla Carla - your choice to believe the lies from the left is sadly predictable.
Carla · 61-69, F
At least I know the difference between what is right, and what is wrong,@Budwick.
You, on the other hand, have apparently lost touch with that. All in the name of winning.
The light is shining on you people, I hope it doesnt blind you.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla [quote]You, on the other hand, have apparently lost touch with that. All in the name of winning. [/quote]

That is what is called projection.
Carla · 61-69, F
I had high hopes for you,@Budwick. I thought you were misguided. But now I know you are willfull in your ignorence. I hope you live long enough to regret your blind devotion.
That is all.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla When my grandmother was nearing death, racked with pain, addled with pain killing drugs, she said things and made accusations of myself and family members that while hurtful - but made by a person nearing death, racked with pain, and addled with pain killing drugs.

You don't have any excuse other than severe partisanship.

I miss my grandmother.
We'll see about you.
Carla · 61-69, F
@Budwick guess that wasnt all.
My opposition isnt to the Republican party.
My opposition is to a very flawed, corrupt, incompetent potus.
But, I knew what he was before he ran. So did you and you support him anyway.
You once told me you supported kasich. He has turned away from trump because of the danger he represents. Too bad you aren't that brave.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla [quote]My opposition is to a very flawed, corrupt, incompetent potus. [/quote]

Your opposition is to the most productive president in history.
Your opposition is based on nothing but lies, misrepresentations, and hyperbole. You've heard it so often - I guess you believe it.
Carla · 61-69, F
So the deep state was after trump in the twentieth century,@Budwick?
When he was a bleeding liberal. Wow!
QuietChaos · 56-60, M
Carla · 61-69, F
@QuietChaos exactly
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
[quote]You just cant be serious.
You must see the hypocrisy in that.[/quote]
@Carla, you can’t be serious.

Do you really believe that @Budwick has the capacity to be self aware?
Carla · 61-69, F
@JoeyFoxx I always hold out hope. 😁
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
It’s admirable.

I too have had my moments of optimism with our mis guided friend

@Carla
Budwick · 70-79, M
@JoeyFoxx @Carla I am not your freind.
Carla · 61-69, F
@Budwick who would have guessed?
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla Joey for one.
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
@Budwick I am, of course, using a very broad definition.

We are certainly not enemies @Carla
Carla · 61-69, F
Mot in my eyes,@JoeyFoxx.