Forgetful or intentional?

Poll - Total Votes: 1

Forgetful

Intentional

You can only vote on one answer.

The attached link is about AOC and Michael Moore filling in for Bernie Sanders in Iowa. Though Moore heaped praise on Sanders, it appears AOC was less vocal and outspoken, and not having mentioned Sanders by name once, might, I repeat, (MIGHT) speak to AOC's political ambitions. Your thoughts. https://www.bing.com/search?q=AOC%20does%20not%20mention%20Sanders&FORM=EDGSH1&PC=DCTS&refig=a0d4a71a9eb24f53bcec7ccfcb4c521d&httpsmsn=1&msnews=1

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

Considering she is still up and coming she is not doing herself any favors for not mentioning him. Bernie doesn't need her. This is likely his last political attempt. Where she really needs to get some of his supporters for anything in the future. Holding off now does nothing for her and doesn't really hurt Bernie.

Likely Moore is actually going to be a successor. Possibly she even knows it hence not saying anything.

curiosi · 61-69, F

AOC has political aspirations. Obama recently came out denouncing Sanders. Since Obama is the messiah of the democratic party it would seem that she holds stock in his opinions. It was intentional as to add distance.

StevetheSleeve · 31-35, M

I’m not sure AOC can do anyone any good. He’s lucky she didn’t mention him.

Add a comment...