Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Federal Judge Rules Virginia Law Requiring Couples to Reveal Their Race in Applying for a Marriage License Is Unconstitutional.

[quote](CNN) A federal judge ruled that a Virginia law requiring couples to reveal their race in applying for a marriage license is unconstitutional.

The lawsuit against the Virginia State Registrar and others was filed after three couples said they were denied marriage licenses in the state after they refused to check a box disclosing their race on their applications.

Finding that the statute violates the 14th Amendment, Judge Rossie D. Alston wrote in his ruling Friday that requiring the couples "to disclose their race in order to receive marriage licenses burdens their fundamental right to marry," Alston wrote.

"(T)he statutory scheme is a vestige of the nation's and of Virginia's history of codified racialization," the judge wrote. [/quote]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/14/us/virginia-marriage-license-race-law-unconstitutional/index.html

Hard to believe it took this long for such a law to be challenged and struck down.
Ontheroad · M
And that is and has always been a problem - that meaning each state can write and pass laws to suit their wants. Too often they have been and still are discriminatory or bigoted.
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
Are there other laws requiring similar foolishness? In other states?
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@ninalanyon

Most likely there are state laws still on the books that would go back in effect if the U.S. Supreme Court ever reversed itself on [i]Loving v. Virginia[/i], 388 U.S. 1 (1967).

Which is why I feel there should be a constitutional amendment that would permanently wipe from state statutes any law struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

That way if SCOTUS were to reverse itself, a state whose laws were struck down would then have to have its legislature re-pass the struck-down law.

 
Post Comment