Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is Adam Schiff The Right PErson To Investigate Trump?


Adam Schiff has had a burr under his saddle regarding Trump since Trump began his presidential campaign. He claimed to have Russia collusion evidence - that he never produced. Now, before the investigation has even begun, Schiff's words betray any semblance of a fair arbiter on the question of Trump's impeachment.

For Schiff, it looks like verdict now, trial later.

So is Schiff the right man for the job?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Carla · 61-69, F
I suppose you think a republican should head the committee. Nunes maybe. He proved he was such an impartial fellow
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@Carla Nunes is too busy suing an imaginary cow. You'll have to think of someone else.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla [quote]you think a republican should head the committee.[/quote]

No, not necessarily.

Do you have someone that isn't speaking as if impeachment were already a done deal?
Carla · 61-69, F
@Budwick impeachment and inquiry are not the same. He did have evidence of collusion. Collusion is not a crime. I think that he is as good as anyone who isnt a trump loyalist. What he says in his intros is really not important, though, is it? It is what comes out from the witnesses in the hearings he leads. The people he chooses to put in that chair. And what they will answer. It's gonna get to a point where executive privilege will no longer be an acceptable answer.

You know as well as I that even if he is impeached, the Senate will not only not convict but mitch likely won't even allow a proceeding to be heard.

I just hope trump doesn't shred our nation to pieces before we vote him out of office.

His behavior, his words. His veiled threats are that of a spoiled child. But this child has the ears of radical right extremists and that is kind of worrisome.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla Thanks for all the definitions and junk.

[b]Is asking for a fair and impartial process too much to ask from you people?[/b]
Carla · 61-69, F
What's fair, in your mind@Budwick?
Having a contract put out on Schiff, one that you are happy contributing to? You people kill me. You excuse everything your master says, no matter how vile. But when a man makes an analogy, you want to see him strung up for treason.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla Someone who hasn't made up his mind before the process begins.

It's a foundation block of the justice system.

My joke was told on a social media platform.
Schiff's was made while addressing Congress.
Carla · 61-69, F
@Budwick the whole nation is watching and opining. Who do you reckon is impartial? Not the judges he inserted. Not one lawmakers on the hill. Who? The only thing that can be done is sit people down and ask the questions.
The people will speak next november.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla [quote]The only thing that can be done is sit people down and ask the questions.[/quote]

Because Adam Schiff has lost his mind?
The country should endure more months of beating a dead horse?

And what of Hunter Biden?
Let it slide?
Carla · 61-69, F
@Budwick if Biden did an illegal thing, he should be held accountable. But guess what? Ukrainians have said he didnt.
It is the will of the people who are represented by Schiff and the Democrats calling for the inquiry. I want to know what goes on. I dont want trump operating this country solely for his benefit.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla [quote]Ukrainians have said he didnt.[/quote]
Ukranians said there was no quid pro quo too.

[quote] the will of the people who are represented by Schiff [/quote]
When did 'the people' express that will? Before Trump and Melania came down the escalator?

[quote]I want to know what goes on.[/quote]

Oh, well, then ...
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
This issue isn’t whether the Bidens violated Ukrainian law, we are talking about US law. @Carla
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@jackjjackson Then why aren't Trump's Justice Dept. investigating them ?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
They are duh. @RodionRomanovitch
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@jackjjackson Are they , on what basis ?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M