Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Can a no-deal/hard Brexit be stopped?

Sadly, it's not looking likely after Boris Johnson just suspended Parliament until right up to the Brexit deadline.

There is not a democratic mandate to do this. A no-deal/hard Brexit has never had majority public support and the referendum result of 2016 includes those who voted for a soft Brexit. Even Nigel Farage himself advocated the 'Norway option' during the referendum campaign. Mr Johnson himself has no parliamentary majority for this move and he has not himself won a general election. What he does have though, is strong ideological control of the majority of his own party and ambiguities in our unwritten constitution means he can carry out this move which is perhaps (arguably) within the letter of the law, though fundamentally against it's spirit.

What sparked our Prime Minister into this nuclear option was the fact that opposition to his Brexit plans in Parliament was finally and belatedly coming together. The opposition to no-deal Brexit commands majority support in the Parliament and the country but is internally divided. Two weeks ago, the Liberal Democrats and moderate Tories refused an offer from Jeremy Corby, the Labour leader, to make him an interim PM to stop a no-deal Brexit. However, the opposition parties have met over the past few days to smoke their peace pipes and looked like they were getting to together a viable to postpone Brexit.

It's clear that there will be another general election soon because the Conservative party has no clear majority and because there is no majority for Brexit. Johnson and his people have been very cynical and ruthless here though in their determination to carry out hard Brexit by 'whatever means necessary'. Rumours are that there could be an election straight after Brexit, after the decision has been made but before the consequences hit. Johnson is counting that the Tory base and Brexit ultras will vote for him and that opposition is divided enough to make him PM again. This is damaging for the country in so many ways but time is running out.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Northwest · M
What's the mechanism for a non-confidence vote?

There's a good reason why Boris gets along with Trump: they are both rebels without a clue.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Northwest They are both populist figureheads but who have cynical and cunning people behind them.

The short answer is: I don't know. They could make Corbyn interim PM to postpone article 50 and call an election. Leader of the opposition carries some constitutional weight so this would work if there was a political will. The Tories hate him though because he's seen as too left-wing. The (right-leaning) Liberal Democrat leadership are not much different on this so it probably won't happen.

As you know, we don't have a written constitution but we technically do have a constitution due to laws and convention. Now all conventions are being ignored and the laws we have are being fought over.

What Johnson did was a grey area and all other things which could stop him are likewise very grey. People are really pissed of with Johnson though and all opposition parties are all against his move. It will be a really messy battle with competing claims of legal, ethical and democratic legitimacy. It's a mess.
Northwest · M
@Burnley123
Now all conventions are being ignored and the laws we have are being fought over.

This is what I meant by rebels without a clue. I was always puzzled by your no-Constitution, laws/convention-driven system. It's kind of like walking into a museum, looking at something, and then moving along, so others can enjoy. Then, one day, some asshole walks in, and blocks the view of the Mona Lisa all day long. There is no law preventing him from doing it, but civilized people don't go there.

Boris and Trump think they're "smarter" than everyone else. That's not true, but when everyone plays by civil rules, Boris and Donald can win. The country does not win. They win, and they are performing to a particular crowd.

Congress said no to a wall. The people said no to a wall. Trump ignored it all, and took money that was allocated to the military, and allocated it for a wall. No one needed to write a law for that, but it's a loophole. Plenty of those out there, and this is going to force "civil" society, to turn into assholes, to prevent this sort of stuff in the future.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Northwest I completely agree. Our unwritten constitution means we are more vulberable to people doing this. The new populist right have no respect for conventions and playing nice won't solve the problem cos they just don't care.

We have to fight back. Its will be ugly but sometimes the war comes to you, whether you want it too or not. If you make a peace sign as tank rolls over you, soneone watching might think you are a nice person...

The hard right are very good at mobilising the culture war in support of their economic agenda and there is no more blatant example than this.