Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Can a no-deal/hard Brexit be stopped?

Sadly, it's not looking likely after Boris Johnson just suspended Parliament until right up to the Brexit deadline.

There is not a democratic mandate to do this. A no-deal/hard Brexit has never had majority public support and the referendum result of 2016 includes those who voted for a soft Brexit. Even Nigel Farage himself advocated the 'Norway option' during the referendum campaign. Mr Johnson himself has no parliamentary majority for this move and he has not himself won a general election. What he does have though, is strong ideological control of the majority of his own party and ambiguities in our unwritten constitution means he can carry out this move which is perhaps (arguably) within the letter of the law, though fundamentally against it's spirit.

What sparked our Prime Minister into this nuclear option was the fact that opposition to his Brexit plans in Parliament was finally and belatedly coming together. The opposition to no-deal Brexit commands majority support in the Parliament and the country but is internally divided. Two weeks ago, the Liberal Democrats and moderate Tories refused an offer from Jeremy Corby, the Labour leader, to make him an interim PM to stop a no-deal Brexit. However, the opposition parties have met over the past few days to smoke their peace pipes and looked like they were getting to together a viable to postpone Brexit.

It's clear that there will be another general election soon because the Conservative party has no clear majority and because there is no majority for Brexit. Johnson and his people have been very cynical and ruthless here though in their determination to carry out hard Brexit by 'whatever means necessary'. Rumours are that there could be an election straight after Brexit, after the decision has been made but before the consequences hit. Johnson is counting that the Tory base and Brexit ultras will vote for him and that opposition is divided enough to make him PM again. This is damaging for the country in so many ways but time is running out.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MartinII · 70-79, M
Dear oh dear. How many times do I have to say these things.

The people voted for Brexit. Nothing more, nothing less. They said nothing about deals or no deals, nor were they given an opportunity to do so. No deal has just as much of a mandate as any other form of Brexit. Why is it that otherwise highly intelligent people cannot grasp this simple fact?

“The opposition to no deal has majority support in Parliament and the country.” Parliament - yes, Parliament - legislated to provide for no deal when it voted to start the Article 50 process, which guarantees a no deal exit after two years in the absence of a deal. Every time Parliament has been invited to approve a deal, they have voted to reject it. If they do indeed oppose no deal, they have a very odd way of showing it. As to the country, no-one else has been given an opportunity to vote on the matter, except in the 2016 referendum (see above).

“The opposition parties looked like they were getting together a viable [method] to postpone Brexit.” And I’m the Queen of Sheba. In any case, the government’s announcement today was not influenced by the strange meeting at Church House yesterday. For one thing, it must have been discussed and agreed with Buckingham Palace some days ago. I’m confident it has been planned from the moment Douglas Cummings was given a desk in the Cabinet Office.

For the avoidance of doubt, this post contains no expression of opinion on the merits of Brexit, with or without a deal, nor on the appropriateness of the government’s decision to prorogue Parliament from the second week in September until 14 October.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@MartinII [media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xGt3QmRSZY]

There is no mandate for hard Brexit because the campaign was fought mostly on soft Brexit, though of could people remember differently.

https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/04/04/what-do-public-think-about-no-deal-brexit

A quarter of the country think no deal would be a good outcome. Its not just parliament. With Faragified Tory party, Parliament is probably more hard brexit than the public.
MartinII · 70-79, M
@Burnley123 WHAT DID THE VOTING PAPER SAY?
thatscottishguy · 26-30, M
@MartinII If you're confident a no deal brexit is the will of the people why are you scared of a second referendum?
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@MartinII LEAVE THE EU!

We didn't vote to leave the Single Market or the customs union. Indeed, that was never campaigned for. The collective re-imagining has been strong though.
room101 · 51-55, M
@Burnley123 Come on man! What do you imagine LEAVE THE EU means? Leave the EU but stay in this bit of it or that bit of it.
thatscottishguy · 26-30, M
@room101 So the referendum means we should have Brexit no matter what it means? Even if it meant we all starve to death people voted for brexit so let's starve instead of asking people if they still want this?
MartinII · 70-79, M
@Burnley123 Stop talking about the bloody campaign. People voted to leave the EU. Simples! To leave while remaining in the single market, or in the customs union, or while relocating the capital of the UK to Timbuktu, would be just as much, or as little, in line with the outcome of the referendum as leaving with no deal. The voters expressed no view on the form of exit, and were given no opportunity to do so. What is so difficult about this proposition? You understand that the earth goes round the sun. You understand that Burnley lost to Arsenal last week. (They played very well, by the way.) Why can you not grasp that people simply voted to leave the EU?
thatscottishguy · 26-30, M
@MartinII Please tell me why you are scared of another referendum if you believe a no deal brexit is the will of the people.
MartinII · 70-79, M
@thatscottishguy I’m not at all scared of another referendum. I don’t think one is necessary or appropriate, but I’m not scared of one. As it happens, the “People’s Vote” people (wonderful Orwellian phrase) seem to have gone very quiet recently.
thatscottishguy · 26-30, M
@MartinII If we have one and leave win then we have a no deal brexit and if remain win then clearly no deal isn't the will of the people so what could possibly be the issue other than you maybe won't get what you want?
MartinII · 70-79, M
@thatscottishguy The issue is that we have had a referendum already. If there were a second one, which also resulted in a majority for leave, that would probably mean that we left with a deal. By the way, I haven’t in this exchange expressed any view on what outcome I would prefer.
thatscottishguy · 26-30, M
@MartinII I didn't said you prefer a deal or a no deal but you very clearly are for leaving the EU regardless. If we voted leave it means there is a mandate for hard brexit. There is no issue other than brexiteers are worried.
MartinII · 70-79, M
@thatscottishguy I think those who want to prevent Brexit are the more worried at the moment.
thatscottishguy · 26-30, M
@MartinII Perhaps but fear is the only real reason the brexiteers are against another referendum.