Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Can a no-deal/hard Brexit be stopped?

Sadly, it's not looking likely after Boris Johnson just suspended Parliament until right up to the Brexit deadline.

There is not a democratic mandate to do this. A no-deal/hard Brexit has never had majority public support and the referendum result of 2016 includes those who voted for a soft Brexit. Even Nigel Farage himself advocated the 'Norway option' during the referendum campaign. Mr Johnson himself has no parliamentary majority for this move and he has not himself won a general election. What he does have though, is strong ideological control of the majority of his own party and ambiguities in our unwritten constitution means he can carry out this move which is perhaps (arguably) within the letter of the law, though fundamentally against it's spirit.

What sparked our Prime Minister into this nuclear option was the fact that opposition to his Brexit plans in Parliament was finally and belatedly coming together. The opposition to no-deal Brexit commands majority support in the Parliament and the country but is internally divided. Two weeks ago, the Liberal Democrats and moderate Tories refused an offer from Jeremy Corby, the Labour leader, to make him an interim PM to stop a no-deal Brexit. However, the opposition parties have met over the past few days to smoke their peace pipes and looked like they were getting to together a viable to postpone Brexit.

It's clear that there will be another general election soon because the Conservative party has no clear majority and because there is no majority for Brexit. Johnson and his people have been very cynical and ruthless here though in their determination to carry out hard Brexit by 'whatever means necessary'. Rumours are that there could be an election straight after Brexit, after the decision has been made but before the consequences hit. Johnson is counting that the Tory base and Brexit ultras will vote for him and that opposition is divided enough to make him PM again. This is damaging for the country in so many ways but time is running out.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
There is a democratic mandate to deliver Brexit though, the public were never asked to vote on hard or soft Brexit, and there is certainly no democratic mandate to allow remainers to stop Brexit at any cost. If there were to be a second referendum, which there likely won't be, it could only be a choice between deal or no deal. Remain couldn't be on the ballot paper if anyone cares about the democratic vote that has already been delivered.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@SW-User I am a remain voter but I accepted the referendum result and took the view that this provided a mandate for some kind of Brexit. Logically, in such a close contest, this does not provide a mandate for the most extreme form.

If a hard-Brexit is what you want, then fine, you can make that case. This is not what the referendum was about though.

[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xGt3QmRSZY]

This is what was said, in their own terms. Almost nothing is made of this but its a big deal.
SW-User
@Burnley123 The referendum was simply about Brexit or remain and Brexit was voted for. The margin of defeat doesn't matter, it still gives a democratic conclusion. If one vote was the difference the case would still be the same. Brexit it is. As of right now nobody has any idea how the majority would vote on deal versus no deal. Nor is it definitively known that Boris will push for no deal over a deal. It is thought by some informed parties that he will actually settle on the existing deal with some cosmetic changes to it, forcing parliament to accept it with too little time to stop no deal if they don't.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@SW-User But what is Brexit? If your campaign on one type of deal but enact another then that is no democracy.
SW-User
@Burnley123 The campaign contained some bullshit, granted. Project fear has done similar. There are so many agendas in play that have nothing to do with what the public might actually want. It's interesting to say the least.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@SW-User I agree that George Osborne tried to bullshit his way through on the remain side. I never liked him.

I don't agree with you and I don't think Brexit can deliver what you want. I never did but I respect those views. The democratic mandate for hard Brexit doesn't hold water though.
SW-User
@Burnley123 I respect those who wanted to remain and if the vote had been to remain I would have respected that too.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@SW-User Indeed and its good you and I can be civil. I just genuinely can't see the mandate for a hard-Brexit though. The leave campaign didn't just lie, they campaigned on something else entirely to what they are enacting.
SW-User
@Burnley123 I agree with you that there isn't a mandate that specifically advocates a hard Brexit. Nobody has asked the public to vote on that. I would argue that any Brexit is more democratic than no Brexit, but no deal has not been voted on and that's simply a fact, as you've said.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@SW-User Thanks for that. I would also agree that the most hard remainers act as though the referendum doesn't matter. I didn't like the result but you have to acknowledge that in some way.

I think its gone past this point though because of the polarisation. We are heading for no deal or no brexit and the culture war will continue for years.
SW-User
@Burnley123 I honestly believe that none of this would have happened if one or two things were done differently in the past. We all know that mass immigration had a big impact on the outcome of the referendum, as did the general lack of protection for British traditions. Those were the things being talked about by the man/woman on the street every day and I'm not talking about the idiot racists either. It's the shift in the moderates that made up the difference, in my opinion. It's those who were on the fence who were pushed over to the side of leave.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@SW-User I think you are right. I myself am pro-migration, more or less but I know a lot of people think (wrongly IMO) that it affects jobs and services. I think Tory austerity has a lot to do with this too. People blame the wrong target but it is what they think.
SW-User
@Burnley123 I'm certainly not anti immigration. I've lived overseas twice, in Muslim countries, and have been treated very well in both. Those countries weren't afraid to protect their customs though, religious or otherwise. There was no equivalent of the 'can't wear your crucifix at work in a Christian country lest you might offend someone' that happened here. Countries in the middle and far east have no hesitation in protecting their identity and tradition. That is not labelled as racism or prejudice and the expat communities that I were a part of never took it as such.