Do You Expect Mueller [the person] To Say Something Different Than The Mueller Report?

Two years, millions of dollars, hundreds of witnesses concluded with the Mueller Report indicating no collusion, no obstruction, no crime on the part of the president.

The left was devastated - just like they were on election night 2016. Now they are interrogating Robert Mueller, right now, as I write this post.

Do you think that there will be a different result than before?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

daisymay · 51-55, T

[quote]Rep. Jerry Nadler: "What about total exoneration? Did you actually totally exonerate the president?"

Robert Mueller: "No."[/quote]

Oh dear, how embarrassing for the Trumpansies.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@daisymay Mueller hasn't exonerated anyone in his career.
It's not what he or the US justice system does.
They investigate, charge, prosecute and if found guilty the person is guilty. If not guilty - no pronounces exoneration - it's not done, never has been. It's one of those trick question like you always ask. Like, "When did you stop beating your wife?"

daisymay · 51-55, T

@Budwick [quote]Mueller hasn't exonerated anyone in his career.[/quote]

That's not what Drumpf said, though. So, I guess you'll need to admit that Drumpf is a liar.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@daisymay I said it - ass wipe

daisymay · 51-55, T

@Budwick Yeah, and Trumpie said that Mueller "totally exonerated" him. So, who is the liar, you or Trump?

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@Budwick [quote]Mueller hasn't exonerated anyone in his career.[/quote] Stop lawyering about, you’re bad at it - in the Mueller report, the team straight up says that they would have exonerated Trump of obstruction, [i]if they could[/i].

And in the testimony you have this:
[quote]“Does your report state there is sufficient factual and legal basis for further investigation of potential obstruction of justice by the president?” Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.) later asked.

“Yes,” Mueller replied.[/quote]

daisymay · 51-55, T

@QuixoticSoul Bud's having a really bad day and it shows. Wowza.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@QuixoticSoul He's never exonerated anyone because there's no provision in law to do so.
[quote] the team straight up says that they would have exonerated Trump of obstruction, if they could.
[/quote]
You say it's because Trump is guilty of something - even though the report doesn't say that.
I say it's because there's no provision in law to do so.

If there was reason to continue investigating, then why didn't he continue investigating?

You're sounding as lame and confused as Mueller!

daisymay · 51-55, T

@Budwick Did you look up how obstruction is a crime and couldn't figure out a way to say it isn't? Sad.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@daisymay Mueller's performance is the most sad.
The future of democrat party equally sad.
Your intentional / willful ignorance, perhaps the most sad of all.

daisymay · 51-55, T

@Budwick Did you educate yourself about the crime or no?