Do You Expect Mueller [the person] To Say Something Different Than The Mueller Report?

Two years, millions of dollars, hundreds of witnesses concluded with the Mueller Report indicating no collusion, no obstruction, no crime on the part of the president.

The left was devastated - just like they were on election night 2016. Now they are interrogating Robert Mueller, right now, as I write this post.

Do you think that there will be a different result than before?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

raysam363 · 31-35, F

So was this another Mueller report along the lines of, "Well I can't say I found anything, but I also may have found something, but..."? Getting kinda sick of this. At this point it's a ploy to keep their jobs.

daisymay · 51-55, T

@raysam363 Not so much, no. He's already confirmed that the Orange Moron obstructed the investigation.

So much for "total exoneration" 🤣

raysam363 · 31-35, F

@daisymay Using gray-area terms and saying "well he could be convicted once he's out of office" isn't much. I get it, you hate anything with even a speck of red in it, but Mueller should have been definitive a long while ago.

daisymay · 51-55, T

@raysam363 [quote]Using gray-area terms and saying "well he could be convicted once he's out of office" isn't much[/quote]
Except that isn't the context. However, I'm talking about this, so deflection noted.

[quote]Rep. Adam Schiff: The Trump campaign officials built their messaging strategy around those stolen documents?

Mueller: Generally, that's true.

Schiff: And then they lied to cover it up?

Mueller: Generally, that's true. [/quote]

And

[quote]Robert Mueller confirmed that President Trump asked staff to falsify records relevant to the investigation[/quote]

----------------
[quote]I get it, you hate anything with even a speck of red in it[/quote]

So what? What does that have to do with the Orange Moron not being "totally exonerated"?

raysam363 · 31-35, F

@daisymay If he was guilty, he would have been impeached by both sides, that would have been a huge boost. Also, "Generally, that's true" is the biggest gray-area you can use. If he confirmed the falsification, they convict already.

daisymay · 51-55, T

@raysam363 [quote]If he was guilty, he would have been impeached by [b]both sides[/b][/quote]

That's bullshit and you know it.

Keep pretending that the Orange Moron did no wrong, or just finally embrace the fact that you don't care that he did.

Generally, in a general sense would mean that yes, almost without exception lies and cover-ups were happening.

If a conservative running their dog and pony show on the committee had any brains and agreed with you, they would hammer that and look for specific instances. Yet, they did not do that at all.

Weird.

I get it you hate anything with even a speck of truth in it.

You can consider our conversation concluded and you can have the last word, so get your best insult together and pretend that was the reason I'm done responding to you.