Do You Expect Mueller [the person] To Say Something Different Than The Mueller Report?

Two years, millions of dollars, hundreds of witnesses concluded with the Mueller Report indicating no collusion, no obstruction, no crime on the part of the president.

The left was devastated - just like they were on election night 2016. Now they are interrogating Robert Mueller, right now, as I write this post.

Do you think that there will be a different result than before?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

hlpflwthat · M

Except for the part where there obviously[i][b] was[/b][/i] obstruction ... which last I looked [i][b]is[/b][/i] a crime 😏

Listen up Jcube - today's the day!

Budwick · 70-79, M

@hlpflwthat [quote]Except for the part where there obviously was corruption[/quote]

Well, that's interesting! I wonder how the entire investigative group trying to paste guilt on Trump missed that!

So, which part are you referring to?

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

@hlpflwthat how did that pan out?
This was not a good day for the Trump haters

hlpflwthat · M

@GJOFJ3 You must have listened to different testimony than I did.

No one is above the law.

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

@hlpflwthat agreed and here is what Mueller first said
“I’d like to ask you the reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of OLC [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) asked Mueller.

Mueller’s response was straightforward: “That is correct.”

Mueller later clarified his response to Lieu at the start of the House Intelligence Committee hearing hours later.

“I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu who said, and I quote, ‘you didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.’ That is not the correct way to say it,” Mueller said in his statement. “As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”

Pretty damn clear, after 2 and a half years

"WE DID NOT REACH A DETERMINATION..."

Clearly did not say we determined he committed a crime but chose not to indict him.

This is really the bottom line finding of the Mueller report

Budwick · 70-79, M

@hlpflwthat [quote]
No one is above the law.[/quote]

Remember that as the investigation into the investigation continues. I think there's gonna be a few sacred cows sacrificed along the way.

BizSuitStacy · M

@GJOFJ3 - funny how the libs may point to the OLP opinion, or how Trump is guilty until proven innocent - i.e. - not exonerated, and continue to miss the single most devastating piece of Mueller's testimony - the clarification that there was insufficient evidence of obstruction. Yesterday was the biggest democrat train wreck in a long time.

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

@BizSuitStacy the dems reiterated this morning that they are going to keep investigating.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@GJOFJ3 Good for them.
Maybe they'll find some common sense along the way.

[I know, I'm such a dreamer!]

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

@Budwick right next to the snowball in hell LOL

BizSuitStacy · M

@GJOFJ3 not surprising. As long as the democrats do not get the answer they want to hear, they will continue to re-ask the same question, over and over.