So you must have a uterus to participate in discussions on "women's issues", but don't need one to participate in women's sports?!

@DarkHeaven who speaks for the baby being killed?

@easterniowegin That’s one specific women and child issue. The parallels you were attempting to draw in this post between all women’s issues and sports makes zero sense. Many people are very torn on the issue of abortion and someone [b][i]absolutely does[/i][/b] need to speak for the child. I would suggest you keep your argument to the specific issue, instead of drawing useless parallels that don’t exist.

@easterniowegin To answer the “new” question. We all do. ☮️

@DarkHeaven I'm simply calling out hypocrisy when i see it. I agree, we all must speak out for the innocent babies here...regardless of sex. The guise of "repoductive rights" only acts to limit participation, wholesale, from "the patriarchy" which seems a little sexist.

@easterniowegin There is hypocrisy in the second question as abortion impacts many not just the woman having the child. There’s zero hypocrisy in the original posted question. I’d be careful of making enemies of would be friends by making it an [b][i]us[/i][/b] verses [b][i]them[/i][/b] debate. A person can be equal rights & pro life. One could argue that the children need equal rights too. ☮️

@easterniowegin I also agree that it is a much bigger issue than simply a women’s rights one.