The current law requires that illegal aliens who make it into the US and file for asylum be released within 20 days.

Release into sanctuary cities who have voted that they want the and have taxpayers willing to pay for education, health care and other services is the only sensible option.

The small minority of SW haters opposed to this obviously have been blinded by racial prejudice.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

CopperCicada · M

So. You take people who show up at the borders. Put them on busses and drop them off in sanctuary cities.

Check.

And given that these are people who walks like a thousand miles to get to the border. And given that they came up doing agricultural work by and large...

... they're just going to sit in San Francisco?

So we are back where we started from.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

It was their choice to get to where they are was it nota d theymay also choose to leave? @CopperCicada

CopperCicada · M

@jackjjackson I guess I don't get just sending them back. This punishing sanctuary cities is stupid.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

Punishing? Most sanctuary city mayors are welcoming more illegal aliens with open arms and providing them with an assortment of free benefits paid for by local taxpayers. @CopperCicada

CopperCicada · M

@jackjjackson I don't get why they just get turned away.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

Only one of many options. @CopperCicada

HerKing · 61-69, M

@jackjjackson [quote]It was their choice to get to where they are was it not a d they may also choose to leave? [/quote]

Presumably then the wall is now so last week and Trump is no longer interested in the 'rapists and terrorists' (His words) coming into the US? It was just for yuks?

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

The wall has never stopped being constructed smart guy. This is additional enforcement of the border law passed by the Dems in 2006. @HerKing

HerKing · 61-69, M

@jackjjackson Oh? Is this the same Dems who apparently want open borders? The same ones who passed into law additional enforcement of the border? Which is it...smart guy?

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

The same Dems that have avoided funding and enforcing the law. Eat your squeak and whistle and pipe down 😂 @HerKing

HerKing · 61-69, M

@jackjjackson Nope, as you keep getting told...Mexico was paying for it. Not the US taxpayer.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

Mexico pays for your squeak and whistle? How did you manage that? @HerKing

HerKing · 61-69, M

@jackjjackson Amusing, but not really answering the issue.. Trump said Mexico was going to pay for the wall..Mexico told him to go fuck himself.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

It’s not over @HerKing

HerKing · 61-69, M

@jackjjackson Indeed, Trump will be out of office eventually and Mexico still won't have paid for a wall/slat fence/ magic curtain.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

We will see about the paying. @HerKing

HerKing · 61-69, M

@jackjjackson Indeed we will, but it won't be the Mexicans. If it was, then Trump wouldn't have tried to get Congress to get the tax payers to pay for it.

CopperCicada · M

@jackjjackson any other option costs more money. detention. prosecution. putting them in san francisco. whatever.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

You’re endorsing open borders then? @CopperCicada

CopperCicada · M

@jackjjackson how is that endorsing open borders? throwing them into SF seems to indicate open borders.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

The current law says they have to be released within 20 days so they have to go somewhere. Why not a sanctuary city where they would be safe from deportation and have benefits paid for by thst city’s taxpayers who voted to be a sanctuary city? @CopperCicada

CopperCicada · M

@jackjjackson why not over the border is what i'm asking?

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

That would be fine with me however under current law I don’t think the government can make them go back although it can be offered. @CopperCicada