What would be a reasonable compromise on this wall issue ?

i want productive suggestions without calling anyone a treasontrump or libtard. and i dont want any arguments why it should be build or why not...

make a suggestion how to solve this dilemma in a way that makes the other side look good. you dont want to "win" you want a compromise and that will hurt you.

Disclaimer: the joke with build only half a wall i claim for myself.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

MistyCee

The democrats will surely throw more money at border security if it's not called the wall, and Trump has said it doesn't need to be called a wall. Devil's still in the details, and those should be hashed out, but the substance of a compromise isn't the problem.

It's who can be trusted to make the deal. Democrats don't trust Trump to abide by any deal, based on his past history, so I think the only way its going to happen is by negotiating between Republicans and Democrats in Congress to come up with something that's veto proof.

Which, btw, is probably what's going to happen for the rest of Trump's presidency.

In a way, this might actually be a win for Trump after all: He'll have gotten Congress to do its job, albeit by uniting it against him. Sounds like a win for everyone.

Strictsinger · 61-69, M

@MistyCee
That’s the most cogent argument on this thread!

MistyCee

@Strictsinger thank you.