What would be a reasonable compromise on this wall issue ?

i want productive suggestions without calling anyone a treasontrump or libtard. and i dont want any arguments why it should be build or why not...

make a suggestion how to solve this dilemma in a way that makes the other side look good. you dont want to "win" you want a compromise and that will hurt you.

Disclaimer: the joke with build only half a wall i claim for myself.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

LonelyMan · M

There is no compromise- the wall needs to be built. This is about National security and finances, not about peoples feelings.

NoSugar · 22-25, F

@LonelyMan well a lot of people have solid econmic proof that this wall would be a financial desaster... so thats a valid concern and shouldnt be put aside for fear reasons

LonelyMan · M

@NoSugar Paying our tax dollars for all these folks is a financial disaster. Also, a price cannot be put on the lives of people killed by criminals being allowed in and allowed "sanctuary".

NoSugar · 22-25, F

@LonelyMan ok i understand the concerns.. what alternatives are there to wall ? someone else suggested an intense survellance system or a hard crackdown on all companies employing illegals...

would that not make more sense then a physical block of concrete that can easily be avoided ?

OggggO · 36-40, M

@LonelyMan They contribute more than they take and commit crimes at a lower rate than citizens.

LonelyMan · M

@NoSugar Crackdowns on wealthy people employing illegals will never happen- rich folks do what they want, we all know that. I feel for the migrants, but we simply cannot afford to take care of the worlds problems.

LonelyMan · M

@OggggO That may be, but we don't need more criminals- we have enough already here!

OggggO · 36-40, M

@LonelyMan A wall isn't going to stop criminals.

NoSugar · 22-25, F

@LonelyMan so what about more surveillance instead of a block of concrete ?