Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE 禄

Gen. Flynn Gets --- a Recess --- and now at 11:53am CDT a Delay in His Sentencing

Just reported. 11am CDT

Former National Security Adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn has been sentenced to ... nothing yet.

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan is really turning the screws.

Telling Flynn that if sentencing proceeds today, he can't guarantee a no prison sentence.

Pete Williams of MSNBC calling Sullivan a "rattlesnake" judge. 馃槀

Basically, Sullivan is strongly suggesting Flynn postpone sentencing in order to keep cooperating, but Robert Mueller basically has said there's not much more Flynn can help him with.

The judge even asked prosecutors if Flynn could be charged with treason.

Why doesn't the judge order that they just rack him up? Geez Louise!

Prosecutors recommended 0-6 months.

What's the judge up to?

---

11:30am CDT
Pete Williams, MSNBC: "[Judge] is predicably unpredicable."

Andrea Mitchell and the other hosts and reporters on MSNBC, not exactly a pro-Trump network, really seem to think Flynn shouldn't get prison time based on the prosecutors' recommendations.

---

[big][b]Trouble with giving Flynn a tough sentence AFTER he cooperated in 19 interviews with Mueller's team is what other defendant would cooperate knowing that cooperating ultimately means didly?[/b][/big]

---

Speculating: Maybe Sullivan wants to sentence Flynn to prison to force Trump's hand on a potential pardon so that Trump would take a political hit by giving Flynn a pardon?

---

11:43am CDT:

They're all back in the court room.

---

11:45am CDT

Sullivan walking back his "treason" remark.

---

11:48am CDT

Prosecutors tell Sullivan they have no reason to believe Flynn committed treason.

---

Flynn's done some creepy things since leaving the military; leading chants of "Lock her up") and especially regarding Turkey. I don't care much about him talking to the Russian ambassador after Trump had won the election. But if Mueller's team is recommending a sentence of no jail time to six months at most, perhaps Sullivan should go with that and give Flynn probation. But certainly not more than what the prosecution wants.


---


11:53am CDT

Flynn's defense team takes up offer to delay sentencing.

So no sentencing today.

Guess that means Flynn's lawyers will now make even more money.

Prosecutors will probably now work behind the scenes to get Sullivan onboard with no prison term.

90 day continuance.

All this drama! And no resolution.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies 禄
No clue, really, but jpain in the neck judges like that drive lawyers nuts.
beckyromero36-40, F
@MistyCee

Sullivan really screwed up on the Sen. Ted Stevens case.
hlpflwthatM
@beckyromero How so?
beckyromero36-40, F
@hlpflwthat [quote]How so?[/quote]

[quote]Again and again, both during and after the trial in this case, the government was caught making false representations and not meeting its discovery obligations.[/quote]
- Judge Sullivan, after dismissing the ethics conviction of former Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska in April 2009.

A jury had found Stevens guilty on seven felony counts and Sullivan sentenced Stevens just days before the 2008 election, which Stevens then lost. That loss prevented the Republicans from reaching 60 seats (which would have enough to stop any Democrat filibusters).

Sullivan appointed a special prosecutor to investigate whether the government lawyers who ran the Stevens case should themselves be prosecuted for criminal wrongdoing. Four were charged, one of whom then committed suicide.

But if the government was "caught making false representations" and was caught "again and again" during the course of the trial, why didn't Sullivan heed the calls of the defense attorneys and declare a mistrial or throw out the charges altogether?

He understandably showed a lot anger after having been made a fool of and according to the [i]New York Times[/i] "delivered a broad warning about what he said was a 'troubling tendency' he had observed among prosecutors to stretch the boundaries of ethics restrictions and conceal evidence to win cases."

No kidding, Judge Sherlock. You just figured that out?

A better judge wouldn't have let the prosecution get away with what they did in the first place to win a Senate election.
hlpflwthatM
@beckyromero And would have let a dirty senator walk scott free, IMO. Stevens was dirty and everybody knew it. It wasn't like Sullivan was lead prosecutor.

And so far as Senatorial filibusters go, no Republican is any position to bitch about [b][i]that[/i][/b] these days - are they.