Top | Newest First | Oldest First
monte3 · 70-79, M
She certainly bothers you people, I like that. 😊
View 9 more replies »
monte3 · 70-79, M
I do find these mutually insulting sessions a waste of time. I am sorry I offended you, not that sorry but hey..😊👋
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
Just wait in 200 years liberals will demand they be taken down.
SW-User
A star is born!!
A fucking hate how we turn these worthless fucks into celebrities...
They're supposed to be working for us!..
Not their fucking ego..
A fucking hate how we turn these worthless fucks into celebrities...
They're supposed to be working for us!..
Not their fucking ego..
SW-User
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@SW-User Spell check would not flag “takes”.
monte3 · 70-79, M
Why thank you sir, I should recheck. @SW-User
anythingoes477 · M
Both parties have things that will go down in history. The Trumps for instance will most likely have between 6 and 11 indictments when all is said and done..........spread over at least 3 family members. I'm sure those will be historical too. That many---in one political family.
anythingoes477 · M
@Stargate And that pitiful rant still won't stop The TRUMPS---plural--from being indicted. lol lol lol Go ahead--I know you're dying too. You all can't make a defense of the Orange Combover if you don't use the magic words..."Obama"...."what about Hillary?"..."Democrats"..and "yeah but what about Bill Clinton?" So go ahead....but remember as you struggle to speak--Mueller is finishing his report and the House is laying out subpoenas for General Chicken Shit My Feet Hurt.
Stargate · M
@anythingoes477 uh dickhead. Keep dreaming. In case you haven't noticed they have already agreed to turn over Ivankas emails.
Indict him all you want. Have fun trying to convict him for something that doesn't exist.
And if Mueller really had anything it would have been released already by "an unknown source speaking under the conditions of anonymity" so try again
Indict him all you want. Have fun trying to convict him for something that doesn't exist.
And if Mueller really had anything it would have been released already by "an unknown source speaking under the conditions of anonymity" so try again
anythingoes477 · M
@Stargate Hang onto that thought. 32 indictments----------so far----------is a lot for man who didn't do anything wrong, isn't it? lol lol lol lol lol
And Dickhead in case you didn't realize it--turn them over or not--the crime was already committed. Classified day to day government emails were ALREADY sent by her via private email. Who gives a shit if she turned them over---NOW--the crime was sending them--stupid.
The proof that this family are the absolute stupidest crime family ever is that for 2 1/2 years Trump has screamed "JAIL HER FOR THE EMAILS". He made it campaign slogan but his daughter was what? In a coma for 2 1/2 years?? lol lol Ivanka is soooooooooo stupid she says she didn't even know it was illegal---after listening to daddy rant for over 2 1/2 years of how bad of a crime it was. DUH!! lol lol lol
And Dickhead in case you didn't realize it--turn them over or not--the crime was already committed. Classified day to day government emails were ALREADY sent by her via private email. Who gives a shit if she turned them over---NOW--the crime was sending them--stupid.
The proof that this family are the absolute stupidest crime family ever is that for 2 1/2 years Trump has screamed "JAIL HER FOR THE EMAILS". He made it campaign slogan but his daughter was what? In a coma for 2 1/2 years?? lol lol Ivanka is soooooooooo stupid she says she didn't even know it was illegal---after listening to daddy rant for over 2 1/2 years of how bad of a crime it was. DUH!! lol lol lol
quite possibly the stupidest person ever elected. her ignorance is jaw dropping.
JustLikeGreta · F
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@DuchessOfMapleSyrup Hmm, that certainly sounds like an informed and nuanced perspective 🤔
curiosi · 61-69, F
There isn't even a word for how beyond stupid this is!
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
The worn-through-the-soles campaign shoes of the youngest woman to ever be elected to Congress seem like a perfectly apt choice for an exhibition that focuses on clothing that empowered women. 🤷♂️
Once again, I find it odd that you guys are so ludicrously threatened by this woman.
Once again, I find it odd that you guys are so ludicrously threatened by this woman.
MarineBob · 56-60, M
What they should put on historical exhibit is the amount of money the dems have cost us over a investigation
windinhishair · 61-69, M
Not to worry. Trump's orange tanning agent will go on display at the Smithsonian once he is removed from office, so you'll still have a place to go worship.
TexChik · F
we need to set fire to them and claim they are a monument to communism
MarineBob · 56-60, M
oh wow. what is she the next imelda marcos
Graylight · 51-55, F
This is what keeps you awake?
This seems to me to say far more about Murdoch and those he panders to than it does about libtards, or even Ocasio-Cortez, tbh.
But I agree, it is stupid.
But I agree, it is stupid.
katielass · F
For what, to highlight the fact that she's probably the dumbest person ever elected to office? lol
JustLikeGreta · F
How dumb. Dummying down of our society. 😖
MrAboo · 36-40, M
Why would any one care her damn shoes?