Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is Donald Trump a stochastic terrorist ?

[b]Stochastic terrorism[/b] is the use of mass communications to incite random actors to carry out violent or terrorist acts that are statistically predictable but individually unpredictable.

The stochastic terrorist is the person who is responsible for the incitement. For example they go on radio or television and stir up hatred toward a particular person or group.

The random actor, or "lone wolf" as the term is used in law enforcement and intel, is the person who responds to the incitement by carrying out the violent or terrorist act against the target person or group. For example they shoot someone or detonate a bomb. While their action may have been statistically predictable (e.g. "given sufficient provocation, someone will probably do such-and-such"), the specific person and the specific act are not yet predictable.

There may be intermediaries in the chain of cause and effect. For example person A hires person B to go on television and incite hatred of group C; and then person D "pops up out of nowhere" and attacks one or more members of group C.

At each step, plausible deniability increases through the diffusion of responsibility. "Oh, it was just a lone nut, nobody could have predicted he would do that, and I'm not responsible for what people in my audience do."

The random actor gets captured and sentenced to life in prison, while the stochastic terrorist keeps his prime time slot and goes on to incite more lone wolves.

The stochastic terrorist may be acting either negligently or deliberately, or may be in complete denial of their impact, just like a drunk driver who runs over a pedestrian without even realizing it.

Finally, there is no need for conspiracy here: merely the twisted acts of individuals who are promoting hatred and extremism, and who get access to national media in which to do it. The rest follows naturally.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
In Trump's case, I don't think it it's deliberate but yes. These acts don't happen in a vacuum.

I also think its no accident that Jo Cox was murdered during the Brexit referendum because of the inflammatory nature of the debate on immigration.

Also, the Finsbury Park Mosque attacker said that he wanted to kill Jeremy Corbyn. As a personal anecdote, I also remember one middle-aged white guy I canvassed telling me that Corbyn should be shot before slamming the door in my face:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42875216

Our politicians usually don't use inflammatory hate rhetoric and (unlike Trump) will distance themselves from it instead of using Alex Jones Conspiracies. However, you know that our tabloid press is terrible and have no such qualms.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@Burnley123 The thing that got me this week was after pleas from nearly every quarter for him to tone it down he actually threatened at one of his rallies to 'tone it up'. He doesn't give a fuck who gets hurt as long as he can get that baying mob to come out and vote for him next week.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@RodionRomanovitch Yes he doesn't care.

Also, I don't see moderate Conservatives calling him out on his rhetoric. Even the 'moderate' Republican politicians seem to equivocating. Trump now openly uses George Soros conspiracies on his Twitter feed and some of his outliers are talking about false flags in the wake of political terrorism. This is worrying enough but - again - I don't see the Conservative mainstream calling out this behaviour as unacceptable.

Maybe I'm wrong and if so, someone can point me to a source.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@Burnley123 It makes you wonder that once this aberration of a presidency is over , how will they explain themselves or attempt to excuse their cowardice. Or will they even bother ?
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@RodionRomanovitch Is Trump an aberration?

From my reading of American politics; he is just one step further than the American right was moving anyway. You get the National Review Conservatives who love the tax cuts and the supreme court picks so see it as a price worth paying because they see the Democrats are worse. In America you also have talk radio with all the nut-jobs phoning in, Breitbart and Fox News getting more radical etc.

I don't think the next Republican Presidential nominee will be quite like Trump and I think they'll be more like Ted Cruz. However, Trump has moved the Overton window and made more crazy things acceptable.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@Burnley123 Well he could be described as the perfect manifestation of the far right in the US. I don't think their politics will be reined in , and in fact you could argue that it will probably only get worse. I just don't think that such a reprehensible figure could ever be elected POTUS again ..... but I certainly wouldn't bet on it.